Viewing: 1-8 of 8
Larry V

Larry V - May 30, 2004 11:23 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Not a lot of material to work with, but you put together a fine page. The history is interesting - consider making it a separate section!

hgrapid

hgrapid - Jun 8, 2004 3:56 pm - Voted 8/10

Untitled Comment

Aside from the wrong topo marks... you need

-76.72, and some weak photos, this page is pretty decent.

Kane

Kane - Jun 16, 2004 12:00 am - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

I think your photos depict this kind of mountain well enough. Don't rush out and buy a digital camera because someone thinks your photos are "weak." I find it interesting that the guy that calls your photos "weak", submits "weak" photos himself and then questions the world as to why he recieves low votes. Your information will get me to the summit, and that's what counts here at Summitpost.

mtwashingtonmonroe

mtwashingtonmonroe - Jun 16, 2004 1:11 am - Hasn't voted

Untitled Comment

Thank you for you comments. It's reassuring to know that there are others who understand that photos aren't as easy as they seem. For some places it's just not easy to get good pictures. But thankyou very much for your positive comments and for your vote. I hope the page is helpful. Thank you again and good climbing to you!

GMatthews

GMatthews - Sep 13, 2004 3:13 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

GREAT JOB!!!

mtwashingtonmonroe

mtwashingtonmonroe - Sep 13, 2004 10:31 pm - Hasn't voted

Untitled Comment

Thanks so much for the vote!

Brad Snider

Brad Snider - Oct 5, 2004 11:08 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

What a great name for a Pennsylvania mountain. Still, looks like a fun one!

mtwashingtonmonroe

mtwashingtonmonroe - Oct 6, 2004 12:48 pm - Hasn't voted

Untitled Comment

Thanks so much!

-Britt

Viewing: 1-8 of 8
Return to 'Short Mountain' main page