Viewing: 1-6 of 6

IdahoKid - Dec 26, 2005 12:46 pm - Voted 8/10

Untitled Comment

Good page Steve but I just can't pull out 4 stars until there are some photos of the mountain...let me know.


2skinners - Dec 28, 2005 1:01 am - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Good page. How do you get the medium sized picture in your overview section? I think it looks better than having a larger picture there in some cases.

Gangolf Haub

Gangolf Haub - Dec 28, 2005 10:47 am - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

A ski area that occasionally gets enough snow to operate adorns the north slopes.

Would that be an occasional ski area?

Nice page!


wildstar - Dec 31, 2005 4:56 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Good page.


Rob - Jan 28, 2008 2:00 pm - Voted 10/10

Ski area website


gimpilator - Dec 12, 2014 3:58 pm - Hasn't voted

Summit Contender

It's worth mentioning that aside from the named summit there is another point a third of a mile to the north which is nearly the same height, likely within 10 feet.

I would be curious to know if anyone has information about survey findings and what the actual height of the northern summit is. Historically, contenders like this one occasionally prove to be the highest point. Thorough peakbaggers should probably visit both points unless it can be proved beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Viewing: 1-6 of 6
Return to 'Waterman Mountain' main page