Looks like several missing peaks since you list only named peaks. Another problem is, you're mixing unofficial names in, so this list is rather subjective. Additionally, you can't find a lot these peaks on a map since the names are unofficial. A more objective measure to rank peaks such as a minimum prominence threshold (regardless of peaks having a name or not), and providing coordinates (and/or map links) would be useful.
wyomtman added me as an administrator and I've redone the list using the 300' prominence rule. I also used one of your fantastic pictures on the page - that is such a great shot!