Viewing: 1-9 of 9

BobSmith - Dec 26, 2005 2:28 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Cool. Only $400K for an entire mountain range!


McCannster - Dec 26, 2005 3:11 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment



Corax - Dec 26, 2005 4:04 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Interesting page and very good timing submitting it.


Super Dave

Super Dave - Dec 26, 2005 4:17 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Maybe all the SPers could take up a collection to raise the $400K...


IdahoKid - Dec 26, 2005 4:43 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Hey, good timing and great page.


The Lower Marmot

The Lower Marmot - Dec 26, 2005 10:37 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Daa! I hate privately owned/restricted mountains... We have some issues with them here in Oklahoma. Very well done page, you have disclaimed it well.

2skinners - Dec 28, 2005 1:14 am - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

I agree with Super Dave, we should all go in on it. I'm in for $150. That's one hundred, not one hundred thousand. And I think it is great that people post mountains that require permission to climb as long as there is a disclaimer.


mvs - Mar 2, 2007 6:58 pm - Hasn't voted

why I couldn't live in Texas

Texas just frustrates the hell out of me. If you want to hike in many areas of the state you have to trespass. And everyone is so damn proud about how they'd shoot you for it. Landowners are such freedom lovers, they soak up all the freedom for miles around. I'll never understand it...

It's where I grew up, and was happy to leave. Ok, end rant.


surgent - Oct 24, 2007 2:13 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: October 2007 Update

Thx for the update. I did read about all this on the bigbendchat page. The whole situation is rotten, I sense, which is unfortunate. I guess we can combine the Christmas Range with the Chinatis and create a "No Access Permanently In Limbo" State Park.....

Viewing: 1-9 of 9
Return to 'Christmas Mountains' main page