A page for the whole Beskides is too much. Half of the Carpathians...
Your page is obviously very focused on the Czech Beskides, plus the SW Polish, with very good information on these areas. But too much contrast with other areas not or poorly described.
Considering that Gorce, Pieniny, Bieszczady already exist as areas, that perhaps Henryk could turn Niski & Sadecki albums as areas, and that the creation of a parent page for Ukrainian mountains is currently discussed, wouldn't it be wise to rename this page as "Western Beskides", encapsulating : Moravské/Slezské/?ywiecki/Makowski ?
The main section about the global term Beskydy/Beskidy could be kept, just as an informative chapter, but I think "Western Beskides" would be more coherent like this.
What's your opinion about it ?
Eric (currently building the Radhost page...)
IMO The most practical thing would be trimming this page to "Western Besky(i)ds" leaving out the Low Beskid/Ondavske Vrchy and anything farther east. Such a solution would go very well with the NE Carpathians chapter on the Carpathians page.
This page was renamed to Western Beskides. Thank You both for Your opinions. It's really a better solution.
Thanks David. It would now seem appropriate to detach the Pieniny and Bieszczady. Thanks ! The Carpathian structure takes form ;
Diky David. BTW Those two theories about where the Beskids end result from the political map being different before and after the 2nd World War II. Ukrainian people don't seem to use the word "Beskydy" for any mountains east of the Bieszczady.