Martin Cash - May 18, 2004 11:05 am - Voted 10/10
AWESOME!Man that looks like some great climbing. Excellent photo! Can't wait to get up there.
rpc - May 18, 2004 11:50 am - Hasn't voted
Re: AWESOME!Thanks Martin!
You'd definitely enjoy yourself on this one - we loved it! As always the photos "wimp up" the steepness of the climb, but the whole thing has really nice exposure to it.
Martin Cash - May 26, 2004 10:08 am - Voted 10/10
Re: 5.9 finger cracks?Dan,
Radek and Shirley did the variation on the third pitch which is 5.9 as described in Selected Climbs Volume 1.
rpc - May 26, 2004 11:21 am - Hasn't voted
Re: 5.9 finger cracks?Maybe it has.
Hard to say if they "really" were 5.9 cracks. That's what Nelson&Potterfield claim. Maybe these are so short that real climbers just dance right over them w/o noticing.
Martin Cash - May 26, 2004 11:35 am - Voted 10/10
Re: 5.9 finger cracks?No need to change the caption. "Real" climbers often tend to be notorious sandbaggers as well. The best person to judge a grade is someone climbing close to their difficulty. Dan climbs mid 11 trad I believe.
rpc - May 26, 2004 11:44 am - Hasn't voted
Re: 5.9 finger cracks?I've tried to change it back to reflect the possible discrepancy in the ratings.
Thanks Martin.
Comments
Post a Comment