Dude, you're just a flat-out nutcase.
Uhh - I know my own mind. There's nothing wrong with me.
.The link in your first post just shows comparative energy levels in different atomic materials; nothing more
There's an error in your statement right there. I asked you to look at graphs; these display two different quantities. So there is more, just by virtue of being graphs. The graphs I asked you to look for have energy levels for neutrons, OK, that's an atomic material, but the y-axis on the cross sections shows the apparent area of the nucleus to a neutron. It's measured in barns and is an area, 10^-24 cm^2 = one barn. Areas are not energy levels.
Similarly, the average number of neutrons given off per fission, aka "nubar", which is also a graph, has the energy of the incident neutrons on the x-axis but has the average number of neutrons given off per fission on the y-axis. It doesn't give the energy of the emitted neutrons you can find that elsewhere.,
Y'know, if you're going to go out and visit beautiful wind-carved slot canyons anyway, just to make a challenging climb (which is what SummitPost is all about), it takes little or no effort to bring a Geiger counter with you. That's all you need, besides a brain that can follow water and drainage patterns, etc.
... the probability of finding that much uranium (or its thorium precursor, as the article mentions) concentrated in one area is incredibly small to not even be statistically relevant. Kind of like going out looking for gold and expecting to find a 2lb/1kg chunk of it just lying on the ground ready for you to pick up.
From Wikipedia:
In literature, there are two nuggets that claim their status as the biggest gold nuggets in the world: the Welcome Stranger with the Canaã nugget being the largest surviving natural nugget. Considered by most authorities to be the biggest gold nugget ever found, the Welcome Stranger was found at Moliagul, Victoria, Australia in 1869 by John Deason and Richard Oates. It weighed gross, over 2,520 troy ounces (78 kg; 173 lb) and returned over 2,284 troy ounces (71.0 kg; 156.6 lb) net.[6] The Welcome Stranger is sometimes confused with the similarly named Welcome Nugget, which was found in June 1858 at Bakery Hill, Ballarat, Australia by the Red Hill Mining Company. The Welcome weighed 2,218 troy ounces (69.0 kg; 152.1 lb). It was melted down in London in November 1859.
The quantities mentioned would be a bare sphere critical mass of U-234. Reseach before posting, or better yet, go out and find the stuff.
You have erroneously declared me mentally ill without consulting the Diagnostic Service Manual. Then you go on to declare that anybody who tries to find this is also mentally ill. Unsupported assertions of mental illness is an ad-hominem argument, a logical fallacy or misleading argument.
I hope somebody posts who has actually challenged these slot canyons to comment on this, post pictures, and take a fresh look without any preconceptions.
I have mentioned David Hahn and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan deposit. This particular deposit had sunk to "lowest probability without being a confirmed dud" because that particular deposit is only 11,000 years old, well below the half life of uranium 234, 2.45 X 10^5 years ( sorry for the typo on an earlier post, obviously forgot to push the "shift" key.) So I was a little surprised at Sheriff Dunlap's call.
He appointed Deputy Daune Smith Special Deputy for Homeland Security. I wrote him before the call and told him what I knew up to that point. He e-mailed me back, "I want to know where there's a warehouse full of this stuff." I told him it was east of his county along U.S. 2, and the nearby Hiawatha National Forest, which is legendary amongst Boy Scouts.
The stuff's out there. Be a hero and intercept a nuclear weapon before it has a chance to explode. You're looking at those areas anyway.