Jeremy Hakes - Feb 20, 2011 12:36 pm - Voted 10/10
Taller than McKinley
Per Bob Martin and John Kirk and per hand leveling, this peak is taller than McKinley. Evidently the map is missing a contour line. Elevation is likely 10,460 +/-.
Brian Kalet - May 21, 2012 12:01 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Taller than McKinley
Its been over a year since Jeremy's correction and the elevation has not been corrected on the main page: LoJ
Jeremy Hakes - Feb 20, 2011 12:36 pm - Voted 10/10
Taller than McKinleyPer Bob Martin and John Kirk and per hand leveling, this peak is taller than McKinley. Evidently the map is missing a contour line. Elevation is likely 10,460 +/-.
Brian Kalet - May 21, 2012 12:01 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Taller than McKinleyIts been over a year since Jeremy's correction and the elevation has not been corrected on the main page: LoJ