When I first saw this page, I thought to myself: Really? That peak is part of Mount Baker, a volcano!
But considering this peak is on the Washington Top 100 for 400' Prominence list, this peak page definitely has a spot on SP.
I'd say this peak deserves a page however it certainly is not on my list of WA top 100 as I follow the Bulger list.
Nice page though
Both lists have flaws, exceptions, etc.
Neither list is completely true to form.
But both are loads of fun!!!
I consider this peak to be a Washington Top 100 considering it meets the requirements of being a peak in the state of Washington. If Sahale Mountain can be a Bulgar, then this peak then even more deserves to be one!
I think it's a great idea. Sherman is a good sub-peak and this a good SP page. So this brings up the question, do Colfax and Lincoln deserve a page as well? I believe they do. They are labelled as separate peaks on maps and for many climbers, they are the main objective.
Apparently, you do not know the "Who Shot Lincoln" rule for the Washington Top 100. ;-)
Josh, regardless of placement on lists or not (not of interest to me, really), you ought to attach this as a child to Baker since it is a distinct peak on it. Having a mountain as a child to another has been done plenty of times before here, and it makes perfect sense in this case.
Done. When I first made this page I considered doing that. As a compromise I added it as related, but considering that it's appropriate to add it as a child I removed it from "related" and added it. Thanks for your input. :-D
Nice work, Josh. -Sarah
Thanks Sarah, glad you liked the pictures. Certainly a beautiful peak of the North Cascades.
Pictures are fantasic!!!!
Thanks Eastking, you should climb this peak one of these days!
echo what Sarah said. This page looks fuc*in fantastic!
This is the caliber that SP needs more of!
You hit this one out of the ballpark, Josh. A++
Thanks Kiefer! I try and do my best when making mountain pages. Recently I been studying for hours on css and how to style pages. It's easy to style something up, but takes a while to get it at just the right tone.
I couldn't care less what lists this summit is on... you've done a fine job here!
Thanks Andinistaloco, I prefer good peaks over not as fun peaks that make certain lists. Perhaps that's why I don't have as many Bulgers as I "should". Thanks for your compliment. :-)
Funny, I just saw this page thanks to it being on the SP front page. Excellent page.
Thanks Dean. I been busy with other pages and such, but I do plan on fixing up Little Annapurna and Enchantment Peaks. It usually takes me a long time for me to get around to working on a page. But when ever I start the work, I usually don't stop until the page is in very good shape.