Datas downloaded from a watch after a day on ski. The graphs show many infos, good to define in general the efficiency of the ski area and the efficiency of myself too.
Using average meters of descent per hour over the coursse of a day (deducting time for the lunch break) as a measure of efficiency, I was surprised at the result. What do you regard to be an acceptable rate of descent per hour?
To be honest I don't know. Normally I check number of runs and total descents in meters. My best performance was done in Dolomiti SuperSki area. More than 10.000 m in one day it's difficult to repeat.
oldandslow - May 31, 2008 12:27 am - Voted 10/10
?What is this? It looks kind of like excerpts from Section 3 of the Wall Street Journal.
Corvus - May 31, 2008 8:12 am - Hasn't voted
Re: ?Datas downloaded from a watch after a day on ski. The graphs show many infos, good to define in general the efficiency of the ski area and the efficiency of myself too.
oldandslow - Jun 1, 2008 1:23 pm - Voted 10/10
Interesting analysisUsing average meters of descent per hour over the coursse of a day (deducting time for the lunch break) as a measure of efficiency, I was surprised at the result. What do you regard to be an acceptable rate of descent per hour?
Corvus - Jun 3, 2008 4:48 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Interesting analysisTo be honest I don't know. Normally I check number of runs and total descents in meters. My best performance was done in Dolomiti SuperSki area. More than 10.000 m in one day it's difficult to repeat.