I only included Snyder Hill because of its significance in regards to county prominence. Otherwise, it would not be a worthy peakbagging destination (for sane people).
Sane or not, this is a nice addition. Consider my sanity, I've been up this one twice but despite the fact that it is a "lame" peak, it is still worthy of SP attention if it helps one other person on their pursuit of the Washington prominence peaks.
Klenke - Aug 11, 2010 12:30 am - Hasn't voted
OMG LOL!Snyder Hill on Summitpost!
Next thing I know, I'll see the lamest of the lame added to the site: Lime Creek Mountain.
Redwic - Aug 11, 2010 8:29 am - Hasn't voted
Re: OMG LOL!I'll leave that one for you. ;-)
I only included Snyder Hill because of its significance in regards to county prominence. Otherwise, it would not be a worthy peakbagging destination (for sane people).
Dean - Aug 11, 2010 8:57 am - Voted 10/10
Re: OMG LOL!Sane or not, this is a nice addition. Consider my sanity, I've been up this one twice but despite the fact that it is a "lame" peak, it is still worthy of SP attention if it helps one other person on their pursuit of the Washington prominence peaks.