Viewing: 1-2 of 2
Ejnar Fjerdingstad - Nov 2, 2012 2:30 pm - Voted 10/10
At that heightit would be the second highest mountain in the Alps, it should be 3701 m. Nice photo, though.
gimpilator - Nov 2, 2012 4:20 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: At that heightOops! Thanks for the correction. I'm used to feet so it easily escaped my attention.
Viewing: 1-2 of 2
Comments
Post a Comment