Welcome to SP!  -

27 May 2005. A side-angle...

[ Sizes: Orig | Med | Small | Thumb ]
27 May 2005. A side-angle...
27 May 2005. A side-angle shot reveals that the Angel isn't as steep as the vertically-taken pictures can lead you to think. SPers Aaron Reid and climb14er are pictured.


[ Post a Comment ]
Viewing: 1-2 of 2    

KaneHi Doug


Voted 10/10

Without researching that route, how much vertical can you knock out on that mod snow hike/climb? Do youeven need crampons? I hiked Shav a while back and regret not doing it via the Angel.
Posted May 30, 2005 10:50 am

Doug ShawRe: Hi Doug

Hasn't voted

One doesn't need crampons and in fact one of the people in the picture (climb14er) isn't wearing them. He also commented that doing it without crampons really sapped a lot of energy..

When the Angel is "full" you can essentially get about as high as the Shavano-Esprit saddle - between 13200 and 13400 or thereabouts. Currently the north arm is melted out so one must stay on the south arm to get that high, and that unfortunately takes you away from the summit.

I believe we estimated that our glissade down the Angel (starting at the top of the southern arm) was about 1200 feet.

There was a narrower, steeper snow climb just south of the Angel that looked like it would have ended up somewhere nearer the summit of Esprit Pt.
Posted May 31, 2005 12:35 am

Viewing: 1-2 of 2    

Rate This Image
Current Score: 74.01

Log In To Vote
[ View 4 Votes | Post Comment ]  
Image Data
No User Image
Submitted by Doug Shaw
on May 30, 2005 12:51 am

Image ID: 107363
Hits: 2761 
Lat/Lon: 38.61890°N / 106.2389°W
Object Title: 27 May 2005. A side-angle...