March 9th, 2005. Now, as Adamello has its own mountain page, I think that this page should be developed to represent the whole Adamello-Presanella group.
My attitude is, that it's better if each peak has its own page on SummitPost. Group pages should give only general information, but photos, peak descriptions and routes should be on distinct summit pages.
I took my maps and enjoyed reading your page. Thank you! But I have some comments to make:
1. What is your page about? As I understand it is about the natural park between Camonica valley and Adamello main ridge. So "Trentino" in the headline is probably wrong. (\edit: corrected\) Name of the page would be better "Adamello Park". BUT: I would prefer a page about whole Adamello Group, also including information about the Trentino side. Of course something about both parks can be included.
2. "woolen pullover" Isn't this a bit old-fashioned? ;-) Nowerdays we have fleece clothing, soft shells, anoraks with membrans and so on. Who can handle a compass in these times of GPS?
3. I noticed that most of the text is not your work but taken from the website of Adamello Park
4. We should decide about the height of Adamello: 3539 m as in the text and on my Tabacco map or 3554 m as in the headline and in most books
5. Your page is not about Monte Adamello itself but about the western area of it. So the page about Monte Adamello itself still has to be done - and this would be the place for the route you also called "Adamello"
6. What about Rifugio "AI CADUTI DELL'ADAMELLO" (I know this as "Rifugio Lobbia"): I've read that it cannot be used because it is in great danger of collapsing because of loose rocks caused by global warming. Is this true?
So I propose to develop your page into a groups page about whole Adamello group, with extending your great list of the huts, a short description of the subranges and naming the main mountains there - as on other group's pages. For this this is a good start - but not finished yet.
A very informative page! I agree with Mathias, however, that you should include the Trentino part as well. Later on we could add single summits like Care Alto or Monte Adamello.
Johan Heersink - Feb 24, 2004 6:47 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentWell, with your assurrance that photo's are coming up soon, this looks good enough to me!
Velebit - Feb 24, 2004 4:12 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentWell done Marco! Page has all the info to give the complete picture of the area.
mountaindog - Feb 24, 2004 9:05 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentIts about time this peak got its own page. Nice work! Would love to see some details on a few more routes.
kletterwebbi - Feb 25, 2004 2:03 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood page right now, some additional routes information would be nice.
Vid Pogachnik - Feb 25, 2004 1:23 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentFinally Adamello has it's page! Great!
March 9th, 2005. Now, as Adamello has its own mountain page, I think that this page should be developed to represent the whole Adamello-Presanella group.
Vid Pogachnik - Feb 27, 2004 3:41 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentMy attitude is, that it's better if each peak has its own page on SummitPost. Group pages should give only general information, but photos, peak descriptions and routes should be on distinct summit pages.
Cheers!
Mathias Zehring - Feb 25, 2004 1:44 pm - Voted 9/10
Untitled CommentHi Marco,
I took my maps and enjoyed reading your page. Thank you! But I have some comments to make:
1. What is your page about? As I understand it is about the natural park between Camonica valley and Adamello main ridge. So "Trentino" in the headline is probably wrong. (\edit: corrected\) Name of the page would be better "Adamello Park". BUT: I would prefer a page about whole Adamello Group, also including information about the Trentino side. Of course something about both parks can be included.
2. "woolen pullover" Isn't this a bit old-fashioned? ;-) Nowerdays we have fleece clothing, soft shells, anoraks with membrans and so on. Who can handle a compass in these times of GPS?
3. I noticed that most of the text is not your work but taken from the website of Adamello Park
4. We should decide about the height of Adamello: 3539 m as in the text and on my Tabacco map or 3554 m as in the headline and in most books
5. Your page is not about Monte Adamello itself but about the western area of it. So the page about Monte Adamello itself still has to be done - and this would be the place for the route you also called "Adamello"
6. What about Rifugio "AI CADUTI DELL'ADAMELLO" (I know this as "Rifugio Lobbia"): I've read that it cannot be used because it is in great danger of collapsing because of loose rocks caused by global warming. Is this true?
So I propose to develop your page into a groups page about whole Adamello group, with extending your great list of the huts, a short description of the subranges and naming the main mountains there - as on other group's pages. For this this is a good start - but not finished yet.
Gangolf Haub - Feb 26, 2004 5:04 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentA very informative page! I agree with Mathias, however, that you should include the Trentino part as well. Later on we could add single summits like Care Alto or Monte Adamello.
Gangolf
Chandra - Mar 3, 2004 10:41 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled Commentgrande Marco!!
Dean - Mar 27, 2004 12:39 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentLots of great information
GMatthews - May 13, 2004 3:14 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood Job!!!
maria grazia s - May 28, 2004 9:04 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentBella pagina, meritato!!
toffa77 - Mar 14, 2005 8:28 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentVery nice page with many helpfull informations! I love Adamello and Presanella group!
Dow Williams - Nov 2, 2005 12:09 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled Commentexcellent group page, super photos...I like the group page concept...very beneficial for the visiting climber..cheers
tiziana - Jan 18, 2006 7:54 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled Comment:)
Cyrill - Feb 15, 2008 4:30 am - Voted 10/10
Adamello mountainsAn interesting report from a region, that i don't know. 10+