Klyuchevskaya Sopka Comments
[ Post a Comment ]
|
| Scott | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice changes | |
| Posted Jul 7, 2004 6:18 pm | ||
| hgrapid | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Good update. Keep working on it. | |
| Posted Jul 7, 2004 9:39 pm | ||
| Pawkala | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Much Better | |
| Posted Jul 7, 2004 9:56 pm | ||
| mtwashingtonmonroe | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Good job and way to turn it into a good one. Keep up the good work and have good one! | |
| Posted Jul 7, 2004 10:58 pm | ||
 | ||
| palic | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I became a new maintainer of Klyuchevskaja sopka page. Please, feel free to look at it once more. Thank you! | |
| Posted Aug 16, 2004 5:31 am | ||
| awillson | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | Much better. | |
| Posted Jul 9, 2004 3:09 pm | ||
| ||
| palic | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I became a new maintainer of Klyuchevskaja sopka page. Please, feel free to look at it once more. Thank you! | |
| Posted Aug 16, 2004 5:31 am | ||
| ||
| palic | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | I became a new maintainer of Klyuchevskaja sopka page. Please, feel free to look at it once more. Thank you! | |
| Posted Aug 16, 2004 5:32 am | ||
| ||
| JXM | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | I have looked at it again and as far as I remember you claimed this page because there was a lot of additional posts not been taken care of. That is still the case, even though many of them are by yourself. If you include the posts you find relevant and delete the ones you find irrelevant or incorrect I will reconsider my vote. | |
| Posted Aug 30, 2004 3:00 pm | ||
| ||
| JXM | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | Btw. why have you ticked the "I reached the summit" flag when you write that you you got to a point 200 m above the pass? It is not important and I don´t really care, but it still seems a bit incorrect to me. | |
| Posted Aug 30, 2004 3:05 pm | ||
| The Lower Marmot | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 8/10 | There are a whole lot of comments from other people and not much information in the body. It does not appear that the comments have been responded to, although I understand many of them are just a day or two old. With additions and corrections, my vote will be raised, but such a beautiful mountain deserves a better page. (edit) I agree with everything that Fred has said, you should still probably delete the additions and corrections of others once you have dealt with them. Your text will need some proofreading, but the information is good. You have improved this page a lot. Thanks! | |
| Posted Aug 12, 2004 4:57 pm | ||
| ||
| palic | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Well, I did not have time to rearrange the page from the former maintainer, try to check it now! | |
| Posted Aug 16, 2004 5:09 am | ||
| tlogan | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Sorry it took me so long to edit my original vote. The page looks great now. Thanks a lot for adding it, I always wondered what this mountain looked like. | |
| Posted Aug 13, 2004 9:59 pm | ||
| ||
| palic | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Well, I did not have time to rearrange the page from the former maintainer, try to check it now! It is completely redesigned | |
| Posted Aug 16, 2004 5:10 am | ||
| Fred Spicker | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Certainly better than it was...... And way better than zero stars! | |
| Posted Aug 16, 2004 8:47 am | ||
| McCannster | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | cool | |
| Posted Dec 1, 2005 7:36 pm | ||
| calebEOC | Glaciers? | |
Voted 10/10 | I dont see any major glaciers which seems surprising for 15k feet at these latitudes. | |
| Posted Aug 19, 2009 10:28 pm | ||
|