A question.

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.
no avatar
Franky

 
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:28 pm
Thanked: 9 times in 7 posts

A question.

by Franky » Mon Dec 06, 2010 6:37 am

What is the lowest rated trip report to ever occupy the front page. I think Ship Rock might have the new record.

The following user would like to thank Franky for this post
John Duffield

no avatar
The Chief

 
Thanked: time in post

Re: A question.

by The Chief » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:02 am

Something to hold your head up high and be proud of.... right Franky?

"The greatest SP tale of lies and deceit for nothing more than selfish reasons."

The following user would like to thank The Chief for this post
robot one

no avatar
Franky

 
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:28 pm
Thanked: 9 times in 7 posts

Re: A question.

by Franky » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:38 am

Eh, i'm proud of that trip and don't really have any problems with that trip report. Have you noticed that it isn't even the first Ship Rock trip report on this website?

no avatar
The Chief

 
Thanked: time in post

Re: A question.

by The Chief » Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:34 pm

Selfish and totally disrespectful...

Edited for clarity.
Last edited by The Chief on Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User Avatar
ExcitableBoy

 
Posts: 3666
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:33 am
Thanked: 663 times in 496 posts

Re: A question.

by ExcitableBoy » Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:42 pm

The Chief wrote:Just because others break the law, in no way is a valid justification for yours or anyone elses reason for that matter, to do the same.


What The Chief is trying to say is you and your partner are a couple of dope smoking, traffic law violating, tresspassing punks. No other climbers would stoop to such scofflawery. :D

no avatar
The Chief

 
Thanked: time in post

Re: A question.

by The Chief » Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:47 pm

No, what the Chief is saying is, if you are gonna do it, do so quietly and not openly spray your misdeeds to the world.

And by all means, show some respect to the people and the land on which you trespassed on to do so.

A concept, ideal and fundamental ethic that clearly holds no place in today's entitled generation. Where the actions and behaviors of these certain individuals will indeed and have, affected the entire access for the climbing community as a whole.


User Avatar
CClaude

 
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:37 am
Thanked: 72 times in 42 posts

Re: A question.

by CClaude » Mon Dec 06, 2010 3:54 pm

Being a northern arizona climber, I have to side with Rick (the Chief) with this one. What purpose does it serve you or the climbing community in general to spray about trespassing on Navajo land. If there ever is hope in the future to have any meaningful dialogue with the community, posts like this doesn't do any good.

Sort of like the stupidity of writing (and publishing) an article about illegally bolted routes in Red Rocks. In that case it makes us look like idiots among land managers.

The following user would like to thank CClaude for this post
lcarreau, SoCalHiker, workmanflock

no avatar
The Chief

 
Thanked: time in post

Re: A question.

by The Chief » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:04 pm

ACCESS is the responsibility of the entire climbing community. Respecting the closures that are in effect is an essential component of any opportunity for those individuals that are active in the arena and fighting to open those closures up to all of us.

Publicly spraying activities that outright tell the landowners to FO, set those very valiant individuals and their dedicated work, back months if even years.

As I posted on the TR, this type of flaunting behavior is BAD JUJU and a very big black mark on all of us as a community.

I for one do not nor will I ever condone this type of disrespectful behavior by anyone and then calls it climbing.

The following user would like to thank The Chief for this post
SoCalHiker

User Avatar
rpc

 
Posts: 2566
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2002 10:06 am
Thanked: 16 times in 10 posts

Re: A question.

by rpc » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:05 pm

in addition to what The Chief said, who's running the front page here at SP now that Aaron is gone? some choices (like this one) have been questionable imho.

The following user would like to thank rpc for this post
Joe White, lcarreau

User Avatar
SoCalHiker

 
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:12 pm
Thanked: 147 times in 88 posts

Re: A question.

by SoCalHiker » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:15 pm

The Chief wrote:No, what the Chief is saying is, if you are gonna do it, do so quietly and not openly spray your misdeeds to the world.

And by all means, show some respect to the people and the land on which you trespassed on to do so.

A concept, ideal and fundamental ethic that clearly holds no place in today's entitled generation. Where the actions and behaviors of these certain individuals will indeed and have, affected the entire access for the climbing community as a whole.


I completely agree with you on this one. Respect is a virtue that is lost by so many nowadays. Many people act in utterly selfish ways and trumpet it to the masses as if they "accomplished" something. Flaunting their act of disrespect and defiance is immature and ignorant and should not be tolerated.

The following user would like to thank SoCalHiker for this post
lcarreau

User Avatar
ExcitableBoy

 
Posts: 3666
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:33 am
Thanked: 663 times in 496 posts

Re: A question.

by ExcitableBoy » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:17 pm

The Chief wrote:No, what the Chief is saying is,


You are correct. That is what ExcitibleBoy is saying.

no avatar
The Chief

 
Thanked: time in post

Re: A question.

by The Chief » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:30 pm

Selfish and totally disrespectful...

Edited for clarity.
Last edited by The Chief on Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User Avatar
mvs

 
Posts: 1054
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2001 7:44 pm
Thanked: 307 times in 123 posts

Re: A question.

by mvs » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:38 pm

Franky wrote:Eh, i'm proud of that trip and don't really have any problems with that trip report. Have you noticed that it isn't even the first Ship Rock trip report on this website?


I actually complained about the first one. The guy who wrote that TR felt pretty much like you did.

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

Re: A question.

by MoapaPk » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:50 pm

I've read reports by folks who got tribal permission, and said the tribe was actually friendly and supportive, and very happy they were asked first. That warm feeling may disappear when they read these reports.

When I lived in NM, we were very serious about respect for Amerind sites.

The following user would like to thank MoapaPk for this post
Kiefer, lcarreau

no avatar
Franky

 
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:28 pm
Thanked: 9 times in 7 posts

Re: A question.

by Franky » Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:53 pm

blah blah blah. You guys see it your way, I see it mine. Their ban on climbing doesn't reflect the will of the community. Their ban on climbing also has little integrity and can be violated at their whim, or for a few bucks. Also, they have no right in my mind to ban climbing at all. I respect their culture. That doesn't mean I have to listen to their climbing ban. Respect for someone doesn't mean following all orders even if they are crazy and given as an afterthought.

The following user would like to thank Franky for this post
mrchad9

Next

Return to General

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron