John Duffield wrote:testid wrote:I wonder what her side of the story is.
I see you're new here. Getting both sides of the story isn't what we do.
LOL. Works for me.
by The Chief » Fri May 21, 2010 11:36 pm
John Duffield wrote:testid wrote:I wonder what her side of the story is.
I see you're new here. Getting both sides of the story isn't what we do.
by mrchad9 » Fri May 21, 2010 11:39 pm
John Duffield wrote:testid wrote:I wonder what her side of the story is.
I see you're new here. Getting both sides of the story isn't what we do.
by drjohnso1182 » Sat May 22, 2010 12:49 am
kramarty wrote:Is it only physical symptoms or mental as well one has to respect to decipher AMS?
Being irrational is unfortunately part of a textbook AMS description, isn't it...there's no need to know her side of story. I certainly would not issue summons to her although her crazy acts may look just for this kind of "reward". Injury is an injury and it doesn't have to be physical.
by Hotoven » Sat May 22, 2010 9:37 pm
kramarty wrote:I'm withholding any final judgment until we find out if she's hot.
by Palisades79 » Sun May 23, 2010 3:22 pm
by Brad Marshall » Sun May 23, 2010 3:48 pm
Bob Sihler wrote:They should have arrested her for reckless endangerment (of the air crew) and made her sit in jail until she paid that fine.
It reminds me of a time when my wife and I were hiking in the Canadian Rockies. There were some parents with a teenage daughter on the trail, and the girl did not want to hike. So in protest, she started doing this really high-pitched shrieking. I was hoping the parents would smack her in the mouth, but they kept their composure and continued hiking, ignoring her. When she realized she wasn't getting her way, the girl shut up and started moving.
It's too bad the rangers didn't call this spolied little brat's bluff in a similar way.
by scottmiller » Sun May 23, 2010 9:30 pm
by Brad Marshall » Mon May 24, 2010 2:32 pm
scottmiller wrote:It sets a scarey precedent; may give others the same idea!
by Buz Groshong » Mon May 24, 2010 2:38 pm
scottmiller wrote:It sets a scarey precedent; may give others the same idea!
by Mike Swiz » Mon May 24, 2010 3:19 pm
Hotoven wrote:kramarty wrote:I'm withholding any final judgment until we find out if she's hot.
$10 bucks says xDoogieX would hit it regardless!
by Hotoven » Mon May 24, 2010 4:13 pm
Mike Swiz wrote:Hotoven wrote:kramarty wrote:I'm withholding any final judgment until we find out if she's hot.
$10 bucks says xDoogieX would hit it regardless!
I'll see that and raise you $10 Hotoven.
Damn it's been a while since I've been on here...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests