asmrz wrote:I used to teach self arrest class for a local club, where we would find an extremely steep (and a very firm snow) hill with a long runout. After showing people the basics and arresting some small slides, we would proceed to push (and throw) people off the top of the hill, facing backwards, facing downhill, falling face down without the use of feet, falling backwards with crampons on and other interesting positions. At the end of a long day, and for years after, people would tell me how much these CRAZY "5th class" ice axe arrest classes helped their confidence in the mountains. Knowing what to do in the worst situation imaginable will indeed give us confidence and knowledge.
Unfortunately, I see so many people in the mountains these days, who do not feel it was essential to learn much. Most of them just want to go...
Either I misunderstood your original post, or you are completely backtracking on what you originally said... I suppose it was my assumption that "Once we have that covered, the limitations of ski poles/axes are removed" meant that you advocate
not using an ice axe. I personally think that having "crampons and ski poles" on for a slope with a potential need for self-arrest, which you seemed to be referring to, is a very bad idea. If you do start sliding, your crampon points may catch (injuries due to glissading with crampons on was one of the top accident categories in the 2009 Accidents in North American Mountaineering volume- bit of trivia for you) while trying to use a pole to arrest, you may just get going too fast to stop with a ski pole, etc.
I think you are trying to make the point that "if you are trained well, you won't need to use an axe because you won't fall," but having it ready "just in case" is always a good idea. I agree that it's better not to fall, but your first post made it seem like you suggested not even learning or using it in favor of just being better prepared.