by Vitaliy M. » Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:34 am
by Dan Shorb » Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:13 pm
Vitaliy M. wrote:Why isn't Lamuria on the list?
by bird » Sun Jun 26, 2011 10:53 pm
CSUMarmot wrote:knoback wrote:You can follow my tweets along the way,
The funny thing is when I get cellphone reception from the summits I do tweet my location. But thats not spraying because no one in the climbing community follows me!
by fredzurensick » Fri Jul 22, 2011 3:57 am
NW wrote:Mountain lists are like any other list, beneficial for organizing your thoughts and goals but obviously limiting if you stick just to them with no exceptions. Example, if I went to the grocery store with a grocery list (obviously) and only bought what was on the list no matter how cheap ice cream was on sale then I would obviously be missing out. But if I got what was on my list and bought cheap ice cream then I would feel good about getting everything on the list and be enjoying sweet delicious ice cream... great... now I want ice cream.
by gwave47 » Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:24 am
by Castlereagh » Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:08 am
gwave47 wrote:Nothing wrong with lists. I have a list.
I want to hike/climb every mountain in America. Preferably starting with the tallest ones first and then making my way down. That way when I'm in my late 60's and can't deal with altitude anymore I'll be on sub 10k peaks.... and by the time i'm in my 80's, my grandson will only have to push me and my wheelchair up sub 8k peaks.
by gwave47 » Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:23 am
by Princess Buttercup » Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:26 am
by radson » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:53 am
by Damien Gildea » Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:46 pm
by MoapaPk » Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:57 pm
by Skateboards2Scrapers » Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:49 am
by AlexeyD » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:19 pm
by radson » Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:55 am
AlexeyD wrote:I'm kind of surprised that this conversation is even happening. Since there is really no inherent logic in climbing, the idea that somehow one reason for doing it is more or less valid than the next is kind of moot. Personally, I am not a list climbed and don't see myself ever being one, but I'd never even think of passing judgment on people who choose to climb for that reason - especially considering that I KNOW many of them are much better climbers than me. In fact, I really don't care what most people's reason is...as long as you act in an ethical, responsible way and respect the environment, it doesn't make any difference. The only thing I don't understand is why anyone would think any different!
by NW » Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:27 pm
fredzurensick wrote:Except in small amounts, ice cream is bad for you. Not sure what that does to the metaphor...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests