Reccomendations for a new synthetic fill sleeping bag.

Post climbing gear-related questions, offer advice. For classifieds, please use that forum.
User Avatar
OJ Loenneker

 
Posts: 785
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:40 pm
Thanked: 15 times in 11 posts

Reccomendations for a new synthetic fill sleeping bag.

by OJ Loenneker » Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:21 am

So It's time to get a new sleeping bag. My old one is worn out, and the funk just never seems to get washed out anymore. Plus it's been shedding down for years, I doubt the fill is anywhere near what it was new 15 years ago

I am looking to replace it with a Synthetic bag, rated to 0ºF temps.
I had been looking at the Mountain Hardwear Ultralamina. But, I seem to have alot of gear by them, and I don't really want to look like I was sponsored by them or something. Not that this is that important, but I wanted some opinions from SP before I make a solid choice.

So what do you use, and what is good and what sucks about your bag. I know, I am going to have a weight penalty for going with Synthetic, but for the climbing and backpacking I do, I always seem to head out in the rain (and it rains here alot in the PNW) so I wanted something that would not be compromised by getting wet.

Thanks in advance for your input.

User Avatar
Brad Marshall

 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:54 pm
Thanked: 17 times in 15 posts

by Brad Marshall » Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:53 pm

I had a Marmot 0F synthetic bag that performed well. I believe their latest model is the Trestles.

http://marmot.com/spring_2009/equipment ... tles_0_reg

User Avatar
bird

 
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:41 pm
Thanked: 23 times in 21 posts

by bird » Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:01 pm

Brad Marshall wrote:I had a Marmot 0F synthetic bag that performed well. I believe their latest model is the Trestles.

http://marmot.com/spring_2009/equipment ... tles_0_reg


5lbs Ouch!

User Avatar
OJ Loenneker

 
Posts: 785
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:40 pm
Thanked: 15 times in 11 posts

by OJ Loenneker » Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:12 pm

Brad Marshall wrote:I had a Marmot 0F synthetic bag that performed well. I believe their latest model is the Trestles.

http://marmot.com/spring_2009/equipment ... tles_0_reg


Yeah, I looked at that a little. The price is really good, but the weight seems a little high. Also, some of the reviews state that it does not compress down very small. I know, I know, it's not going to compress as small as down. But, from what I have seen with some of the new synthetics, like primaoft (I have a jacket with that fill) they compress as small as down, and feel like they have the same weight.

User Avatar
Brad Marshall

 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:54 pm
Thanked: 17 times in 15 posts

by Brad Marshall » Sat Nov 28, 2009 1:40 am

bird wrote:
Brad Marshall wrote:I had a Marmot 0F synthetic bag that performed well. I believe their latest model is the Trestles.

http://marmot.com/spring_2009/equipment ... tles_0_reg


5lbs Ouch!


Ya, most others are in the 3.5 to 4.5 pound range if you trust their temperature ratings. Sierra Designs has the Nahche at 4 lb 1 oz, Integral Designs the Emporor at 4 lb 14 oz, North Face the Snowshoe at 3 lb 8 oz and MHW the Ultralimina at 3 lb 5 oz.

User Avatar
divnamite

 
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:32 am
Thanked: 4 times in 4 posts

by divnamite » Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:07 am


User Avatar
battledome

 
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:56 pm
Thanked: 1 time in 1 post

by battledome » Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:43 am

I've got a down bag by Montbell, and it's my single favorite piece of gear. I can only imagine that their synthetic stuff would be just as awesome. I find that its warmth way exceeds its rating.

Also... my first bag every was a Sierra Designs synth. It was a good bag for a great price, and I've had really good experiences when sending gear in to them for maintenance.


Return to Gear

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests