Steve Gruhn wrote:It might even make sense to split up Alaska and Canada into two separate forums. Their combined geographic area is about double that of the Lower 48. So, someone interested in climbs in Labrador is forced to sift through a lot of information about climbs and routes that aren't within 4000 miles of his area of interest.
I don't see how someone in Alaska or Canada is sifting though more information. California has 1382 mountains with content on SP, and in contrast there are only 537 pages on peaks in Alaska or Canada. In the forums, the California forum has 30 pages, while this one has only 4.
Doesn't seem like too much of a burden to sift through the AK/Canada info IMHO.