I've recently been going through mountain pages with low scores. There have been several that were really awful-- abandoned, no route, incomplete, no attachments-- and they've been zapped to reduce clutter and improve the overall quality of site content.
However, I've run into a problem: there are lots of bad pages that have log entries, attachments such as routes and trip reports, and photos by others. Deleting these pages would mean erasing the logs and sending the attachments into limbo, so I am reluctant to do that.
Some, I think, are better than the scores suggest and seem to have been updated after the low votes. Some still belong to active members who have no apparent interest in improving the pages. Most are just bad.
If you have some time and interest, please take a look at these pages and see if there are any you might be willing to adopt and improve. Remember that we can erase low votes so you are not saddled with bad scores.
You can start here: http://www.summitpost.org/object_list.php?object_type=1&sort_select_1=score&order_type_1=ASC.
Thank you for any consideration you give this!
By the way, please ignore the pages by strudolyubov that you will see with 0%. He has recently begun rebuilding pages that a former member deleted.