Uphill ski traffic restriced at Whitefish Mountain Resort

Mountaineering, rock climbing, and hiking news.
User Avatar
Kowski

 
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:27 am
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

Uphill ski traffic restriced at Whitefish Mountain Resort

by Kowski » Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:30 am

Whitefish Mountain Resort in Whitefish Montana has become the latest ski resort to limit uphill traffic on skins. Press release.

Resistance is mounting... Facebook group and http://www.uphilltraffic.org

If you're impacted, please get involved to see if we can work with the resort to implement common sense guidelines to manage uphill traffic.

--Kowski out

User Avatar
peakhugger

 
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:27 am
Thanked: 7 times in 7 posts

by peakhugger » Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:15 am

Hate to say it, but this decision sounds relatively reasonable. Granted you're losing the evening skiing opportunity, but it's a classic case of a couple of idiots ruining it for everyone. In our litigious society, I can't blame WMR or the USFS:

This season, resort staff have reported several near-miss incidents with winch cats [...] [recently] a grooming operator watched an after-hours hiker ski beneath his winch cable, encountering aggressive resistance when the skier was asked to vacate the area for his safety...

"Our grooming operators are constantly worried that they're going to inadvertently injure or kill someone who makes a bad decision out there..."


Sounds like someone's going to lose their head, literally.


The policy [...] will restrict uphill traffic [...] to a single route on the mountain, as well as limiting the hours[...]. Uphill traffic will be allowed on the route during ski season from 6:30 a.m. until the resort closes... [and] between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. for the first 14 days after ski season ends, with no active restrictions outside those hours and dates.


This policy is a heck of a lot better then other policies I'm aware of, including Bridger Bowl's which prohibits all uphill traffic all the time within the ski area boundary. I'd kill to have a designated route at Bridger for early morning runs (or even mid-morning), but that will probably never happen. So, IMO, enjoy what you have, it could be a lot worse.


[And yes, I understand the argument against restricting human-powered public activities on public land, but there's plenty of precedent for this when the common public good it at stake (municipal water supplies, temporary fire closures, wildlife area closures)]

User Avatar
Kowski

 
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:27 am
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

by Kowski » Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:49 pm

What's interesting is that most of the uphillers agree that some restrictions need to be implemented. The biggest concern is losing the evenings.

The way it went down was bad too...basically no notice, just a press release one day.

User Avatar
OJ Loenneker

 
Posts: 785
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 10:40 pm
Thanked: 15 times in 11 posts

by OJ Loenneker » Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:08 am

They tried to do this too at Mt. Bachelor. The amount of resistance was overwhelming, and they retreated with creating a uphill corridor for us skinnin' types.

Keep up the pressure on these ski resorts that operate with permits from the USFS! It's OUR land, and in reality they should have no reason to kick someone out.


Return to News

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests