Its nice to see this one since there is no information on this peak anywhere else. Nice work. Appreciate the maps and pics.
Thanks! Hope you can put this to use sometime soon in the Spring
Given this mountain has over 2,000' of prominence, why did you call it Pt. 10459 and not Peak 10459?
Dean - Nov 19, 2012 11:25 pm - Voted 10/10
nice informationIts nice to see this one since there is no information on this peak anywhere else. Nice work. Appreciate the maps and pics.
Castlereagh - Dec 11, 2012 12:17 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: nice informationThanks! Hope you can put this to use sometime soon in the Spring
hgrapid - Jul 15, 2015 11:26 am - Hasn't voted
Pt. 10459?Given this mountain has over 2,000' of prominence, why did you call it Pt. 10459 and not Peak 10459?