Welcome to SP!  -

[ Post a Comment ]
Viewing: 1-13 of 13    

jthiessenUntitled Comment

jthiessen

Voted 8/10

Good info. I never new about this peak.
Posted May 14, 2002 9:40 am

ScottySUntitled Comment

ScottyS

Voted 10/10

Could use some color in the description, but all the photos tell the story --- really helped on my traverse of the Palisades in 2002! That was one scaaaary free-climb.
Posted Mar 10, 2003 10:05 pm

Henning LegeUntitled Comment

Voted 10/10

I don't know this peak. But the page looks good and apparently needs protection.
Posted Mar 11, 2003 2:44 am

MishaUntitled Comment

Misha

Voted 10/10

Good page!
Posted Mar 11, 2003 8:47 am

Fred SpickerUntitled Comment

Fred Spicker

Voted 8/10

Maybe a brief summary under the History heading for those of us who do not have the referenced book. And, a little more on the climbing.
Posted Mar 11, 2003 12:35 pm

Martin CashUntitled Comment

Martin Cash

Voted 8/10

Please elaborate some more on all sections. Good job so far.
Posted Mar 11, 2003 3:34 pm

mrolphUntitled Comment

mrolph

Voted 8/10

It's not the most detailed page on SP, but the basic are there and the photos are great.
Posted Mar 11, 2003 3:37 pm

autoblockUntitled Comment

autoblock

Hasn't voted

A little more information on the actual routes would be nice. And what's up with the "traverse" description that somehow calls it a 5.6-5.7 "scramble"? Peter Croft may consider 5.7 a scramble, but most of us don't.



Why is information on California 14ers so much poorer than on Colorado's? Do Californians just want to keep them to themselves?
Posted Jun 18, 2003 2:18 pm

RomainUntitled Comment

Romain

Hasn't voted

Well, I did not enter the traverse description so I can't amend it. But Webster's dictionary defines to scramble as "to move or climb hastily on all fours". I think 5.7 can qualify.



Do you really think this is enough to justify a rating of 0 stars? I would really appreciate it if you increased it. If not, please propose more constructive ways to improve the page. Starlight is not often climbed, technical on all sides, and few people have particularly good info or pictures on it. In contract, most Colorado 14ers are hikes, and I suspect that's why the info is better.
Posted Jul 1, 2003 12:47 am

tloganUntitled Comment

tlogan

Voted 8/10

Nice page.
Posted Jan 25, 2004 2:49 pm

ScottUntitled Comment

Scott

Voted 5/10

A little more detail to the sections might be nice, but it's a good page.
Posted Apr 8, 2004 5:15 pm

cp0915Untitled Comment

cp0915

Voted 10/10

With 3 routes from 3 directions now on the page, it's starting to come together! A really nice (sub)peak.
Posted Aug 22, 2005 12:57 pm

James CUntitled Comment

James C

Voted 8/10

pretty good, pretty good
Posted Jan 31, 2006 7:46 pm

Viewing: 1-13 of 13    
[ Return to 'Starlight Peak' main page ]