Now this is a SURPRISE! :-) Never thought to see Svinjak on SP! But I agree that it deserves the page. If you wonder why I gave it 9 my way of thinking is this: what more can you write about Svinjak?! I don't see how can page about Svinjak be any better, except maybe detailed approach description. That is why it is not 10 :-)
Vid,
I think Svinjak has perfect right to be in SP. Good work. I only would work a little bit more in the route description and add, some photos (of the summit, views over the ridge, etc...). I am sure you will add them in the future...Thanks for posting.
Of course I'm sure! Not that I'm more pleased receiving 9/10 votes than 10/10 votes, I'm not an idiot to claim that, but I believe that honest voting can help SP to become better and better. We should simply have in mind the definitions of votes in our scale: 5 is average, 6 is already above average and 10 is something like 'the best ever'. I know it's hard to use the scale strictly. If I know that somebody is realistic, then a vote of 8 means more to me than a vote of 10 from somebody who is giving only 10s. Anyway I think that Josh will soon come up with a formula, which will take this into account. And it's easy to implement it, we were discussing that. His computer anyway does millions of calculations every second.
Velebit - Mar 28, 2006 7:43 pm - Voted 9/10
SvinjakNow this is a SURPRISE! :-) Never thought to see Svinjak on SP! But I agree that it deserves the page. If you wonder why I gave it 9 my way of thinking is this: what more can you write about Svinjak?! I don't see how can page about Svinjak be any better, except maybe detailed approach description. That is why it is not 10 :-)
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 28, 2006 7:50 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: SvinjakThanks, Sasa! We are all too generous with grades :-) This is a small, average page. But why not posting all interesting mountains :-)
Gangolf Haub - Mar 28, 2006 7:45 pm - Voted 9/10
Looks like Höfatsin the Allgäu Alps. Nice profile for this mountain!
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 28, 2006 7:51 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Looks like HöfatsYes, like Höfats :-)
kamil - Mar 28, 2006 9:40 pm - Voted 10/10
nista tu ne nedostaje......u ovoga Świniaka :)
Yeh, who said only prominent mountains should be here. Otherwise most people would never hear about this one.
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 29, 2006 6:27 am - Hasn't voted
Re: nista tu ne nedostaje...Jedno malo svinjèe... :-)
John Climber - Mar 28, 2006 10:21 pm - Voted 8/10
Interesting peakVid,
I think Svinjak has perfect right to be in SP. Good work. I only would work a little bit more in the route description and add, some photos (of the summit, views over the ridge, etc...). I am sure you will add them in the future...Thanks for posting.
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 29, 2006 6:28 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Interesting peakThanks for visiting, good comments and voting :-)
Charles - Mar 30, 2006 1:12 pm - Voted 9/10
Nice peakThanks for posting it!
Cheers
Charles
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 30, 2006 7:38 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Nice peak:-)
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 31, 2006 11:35 am - Hasn't voted
Re: nice!Thanks Lolli,
yes the ascent route is simple to follow, marked and very direct. But the vote 10/10 is unrealistic anyway :-)
Cheers!
Vid
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 31, 2006 7:57 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: nice!Of course I'm sure! Not that I'm more pleased receiving 9/10 votes than 10/10 votes, I'm not an idiot to claim that, but I believe that honest voting can help SP to become better and better. We should simply have in mind the definitions of votes in our scale: 5 is average, 6 is already above average and 10 is something like 'the best ever'. I know it's hard to use the scale strictly. If I know that somebody is realistic, then a vote of 8 means more to me than a vote of 10 from somebody who is giving only 10s. Anyway I think that Josh will soon come up with a formula, which will take this into account. And it's easy to implement it, we were discussing that. His computer anyway does millions of calculations every second.
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 31, 2006 9:00 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: nice!:-)