Aaron Johnson - Apr 29, 2005 7:18 pm - Voted 10/10
Agreed!And without a doubt, the very same angle seen here is also seen on SP hundreds of times. Okay, we get it! Everyone knows what the mountains looks like from this angle. Future submitters should try to submit new angles of this highly photographed mountain. Let's see some originality!
The ongoing debate about redundancy has been raging on SP this week. This is perhaps the most efficient example I've seen yet. Thanks for posting this Mathias. It makes the point quite clear.
desainme - Apr 29, 2005 9:31 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Agreed!The "seldom" seen west face was recently posted
http://www.summitpost.org/images/151352.jpg
Mathias Zehring - Apr 30, 2005 2:42 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Agreed!I thought this picture had some irony to show this fact. But the low votes show that it seem not to be appreciatetd. If not other opinions or votes are posted I will of course delete the picture.
Aaron Johnson - May 1, 2005 1:48 am - Voted 10/10
Re: Agreed!Mathias-I voted 4 stars because it does indeed do a great job of proving the point. Thank again for posting it, if for no other reason than that! If you decide to delete it, let me know and I'll do it. I'll need to delete the comments first in reverse order, then the photo. This helps keep the database "clean." Thanks.
Mathias Zehring - May 1, 2005 2:14 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Agreed!when you set your first comment there were two votes with 0+1 star. Therefore I was not sure. I have at least 30 pictures of Matterhorn that I _don't_ post because they would be duplicates.
Comments
Post a Comment