A question.

by **lcarreau** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:53 am

Fletch wrote:
This chick is beat...

The following user would like to thank lcarreau for this post
workmanflock

by **lcarreau** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:01 am

This horse is beat.

by **Bob Sihler** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:06 am

Unless Chief sees mattski's post about Delicate Arch, both directions of this thread are this:

by **Bob Sihler** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:38 am

Franky wrote:Well, seems this thread is concluded with nobody presenting any reason to not climb ship rock.

In my one truly serious post on this thread before this one, I said I wasn't playing the judge, and I'm still not, and you said you appreciated my words.

So I have to disagree with what you've said. People have provided several legitimate reasons not to climb Ship Rock, legality and respect for cultural beliefs being chief among them, plus the idea that not everything has to be climbed just because it's there. You have chosen to dismiss them. Just because you disagree or because others have done it doesn't make it right.

Your only sound reason to climb it seems to be that you wanted to.

What we have here is a sharp difference of perspectives, and maybe even of generations, though some posts are exceptions to that idea in both regards.

Again, I'm not sitting on the throne and judging you. But you're wrong in saying that nobody has presented a reason not to climb Ship Rock.

(Note-- this is again as a member, not a moderator; don't read anything more into this beyond what I've written.)

The following user would like to thank Bob Sihler for this post
Arthur Digbee, dmiki, Dow Williams, lcarreau, MarkDidier, SoCalHiker

by **dskoon** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:53 am

Bob Sihler wrote:
Franky wrote:Well, seems this thread is concluded with nobody presenting any reason to not climb ship rock.

In my one truly serious post on this thread before this one, I said I wasn't playing the judge, and I'm still not, and you said you appreciated my words.

So I have to disagree with what you've said. People have provided several legitimate reasons not to climb Ship Rock, legality and respect for cultural beliefs being chief among them, plus the idea that not everything has to be climbed just because it's there. You have chosen to dismiss them. Just because you disagree or because others have done it doesn't make it right.

Your only sound reason to climb it seems to be that you wanted to.

What we have here is a sharp difference of perspectives, and maybe even of generations, though some posts are exceptions to that idea in both regards.

Again, I'm not sitting on the throne and judging you. But you're wrong in saying that nobody has presented a reason not to climb Ship Rock.

(Note-- this is again as a member, not a moderator; don't read anything more into this beyond what I've written.)

Yep, he's wrong all right, but his tone says he's young and he's "right!"

The following user would like to thank dskoon for this post
Marmaduke

by **Marmaduke** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:14 am

Franky wrote:I guess when one is old the novelty of posting stupid photos on an internet forum is worth the time.

Well, seems this thread is concluded with nobody presenting any reason to not climb ship rock. you all can go back to your weird internet flirting stuff now.

Here's my contribution to posting a stupid photo!

by **bgriffs** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:21 am

What kind of asshole knowingly climbs in a sacred area?

by **SoCalHiker** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:25 am

bgriffs wrote:What kind of asshole knowingly climbs in a sacred area?

After pages after pages going back and forth about this topic, to come up at this point with that post is hilarious.

Well, I guess that concludes our program

by **The Chief** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:25 am

Bob Sihler wrote:Unless Chief sees mattski's post about Delicate Arch, both directions of this thread are this:

Oh it is dead alright.

Both Mattski's and Franki's outspoken and complete ignorance, sealed that fate.

by **lcarreau** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:09 pm

I'm going to bring this thread back to life, but only because
these dude's "know-it-all attitude" shouldn't be a viewed as a shocker.

After all, isn't it the SAME generation that brought us this ??

by **blazin** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:15 pm

lcarreau wrote:After all, isn't it the SAME generation that brought us this ??

Uhh, no. Beavis and Butthead first aired in the early 1990's. Franky would have been much to young to be doing any animation then! I know all us young whippersnappers are hard to keep track of, but you gotta be able to tell your Gen X from the Gen Y.

The following user would like to thank blazin for this post
lcarreau

by **Arthur Digbee** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:43 pm

lcarreau wrote:After all, isn't it the SAME generation that brought us this ??

Larry, you too are officially an Old Fart. Welcome to the club!

by **lcarreau** » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:57 pm

Arthur Digbee wrote:
lcarreau wrote:After all, isn't it the SAME generation that brought us this ??

Larry, you too are officially an Old Fart. Welcome to the club!

Hey, thanks Art !!!

I'm from the BABY-BOOMERS, back when all those mothers were having all those babies.

And.. when I fart, it goes "BOOM BOOM!" Yep, kinda like a freakin' cannon going off.

by **lcarreau** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:25 am

Actually, THESE were the type of tunes we listened to ...

"Mama told me not to come; to Shiprock."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKaQzQAlNn4&feature=related

Sorry, but it was BEFORE they had 'youtube ..'

by **Arthur Digbee** » Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:46 am

lcarreau wrote:And.. when I fart, it goes "BOOM BOOM!" Yep, kinda like a freakin' cannon going off.

TMI, you old fart. You're going to level up to "curmudgeon" status if you're not careful.

A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Re: A question.

Who is online