by Arthur Digbee » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:17 pm
by Dow Williams » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:42 pm
by jeffn » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:59 am
by Dow Williams » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:40 pm
Josh Lewis wrote:Man climbing is getting expensive. I suppose I understand, but this is reminding me of what happened with Aconcagua.
by SKI » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:32 pm
Dow Williams wrote:Which is a good thing Josh. Best advice I could give to someone like yourself, is to focus less on the name of an objective and much more on the experience. So many wilder, scenic and wicked places to climb than Aconcagua and Denali. The more you delve into the talent (technical) aspect of getting up a wall or mountain, far less folks, trash and government intrusion you will find. Cheers.
by mattyj » Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:31 pm
jeffn wrote:Another idea is to cut down on the baby sitting. This might mean letting some more people die on Denali. If you don't want to risk death on Denali, don't go there.
by Brad Marshall » Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:59 am
Arthur Digbee wrote:You math geniuses will note that even $500 a head will only cover about half the program costs, making the general taxpayer responsible for the rest. Of course this is part of a general increase in NPS fees for everything in the national parks.
by mattyj » Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:56 pm
96avs01 wrote:Curious as to how you know he ascended too quickly?
by Brad Marshall » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:53 am
mattyj wrote:The point I'm trying to make is that climbers alter their risk management based on the size of the NPS's safety net...
by AndyJB444 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:49 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests