by CSUMarmot » Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:34 pm
by Marmaduke » Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:52 pm
CSUMarmot wrote:Ive gotten one 9 in my life. And it eats away at me...
by chugach mtn boy » Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:00 am
by ExcitableBoy » Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:29 am
by MoapaPk » Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:59 am
by MarkDidier » Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:30 am
MoapaPk wrote:Maps get stuck in the huge bin of new photos, and get few votes. Typically a map is far, far more useful to someone who actually comes to SP for (shock!) beta, that is a wonderful picture of a sunset over the same area.
by lcarreau » Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:36 am
mvs wrote:...at the end of a month people start being mean and voting a bunch of 4,5,6s for a couple of days because they know the monthly credibility calculation is about to happen. Then it's back to treating the votes as a "Like" button ... :p
by Baarb » Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:40 am
by mrchad9 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:46 am
by lcarreau » Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:58 am
by alpine345 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:10 am
by Josh Lewis » Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:14 am
mrchad9 wrote:I know... it was a douchebag move.
by mrchad9 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:23 am
alpine345 wrote:That's not the way it's supposed to work?? Why not??
mrchad9 wrote:The current algorithm SP uses is the one below. Vote less than a ten and you are pissing on them.
1 The Worst. Ever.
2 The Worst. Ever.
3 The Worst. Ever.
4 The Worst. Ever.
5 The Worst. Ever.
6 The Worst. Ever.
7 The Worst. Ever.
8 The Worst. Ever.
9 The Worst. Ever.
10 Above Average to The Best. Ever.
by Josh Lewis » Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:25 am
alpine345 wrote:That's not the way it's supposed to work?? Why not?? I thought the goal was to provide quality information via peer review. If not that totally changes the way I'll interpret articles from now on.
Montana Matt wrote:and it "throws out" votes that are "outliers" compared to other votes on the same page or that the person has given.
by Marmaduke » Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:44 am
alpine345 wrote:I'm new at playing this game. I thought a 5 corresponded to a "C" in school and a 10 was "A+". Based on that, I gave EB a 9 (an"A") on his recent article. We PM'ed and had a nice dialog. That's not the way it's supposed to work?? Why not?? I thought the goal was to provide quality information via peer review. If not that totally changes the way I'll interpret articles from now on.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest