The same newest members have been on the front page for several days now. I'm sure SP has added new members since then. Why hasn't the newest members section changed? I enjoy seeing who has joined the SP family every day.
I suggest all pictures on this site should be geo-localized. Even if it's a huge work to update all the existing pictures, that will give sense and usefullness to the big amount of posted pictures.
It seems some SP users don't know how to localize pictures with google maps tool. New Google maps with altitude and relief helps a lot, but some summit names are wrong.
I just noticed that most SP info (including a few pages I made- this page and it's children and peak 6525) for the Chugach range of Alaska is parented by a Chugach Album. I'm sure I'm not the best authority for making a proper area/range page for the Chugach. What's the procedure in this case?
Thanks all,
Jed
Read more :Chugach Range | Views : 6087 | Replies : 2
Spammers around
Before you respond to any "Comment", check it out first. They've been lurking on Mbpost.
Like, is the person in the Profile also in their images. It's easy to say you are someone, talk some stuff, steal a few pics and say you are a climber. So don't just reply by e-mail until you've been conversing for a while.
I'm on this site from time to time, occasionally looking for beta, and find it hilarious that basically everything anyone posts can be rated by everyone else. Have climbers gotten bored over bickering over climbing ratings, so they have to go on here and downrate anything they don't like to make their daily quotas of being a bunch of grumpy wankers? I think I've even had a rock/route removed, since, keeping with the spirit of ...