What happened? Maintenance?

Suggestions and comments about SummitPost's features, policies, and procedures. Post bugs here.
User Avatar
Guyzo

 
Posts: 2567
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:11 am
Thanked: 24 times in 13 posts

by Guyzo » Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:54 pm

I had my fears....

scary

:wink:

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

by MoapaPk » Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:58 pm

Global warming.

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

by lcarreau » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:08 pm

Seismic shaking and weathering by frost heave.

User Avatar
outofstep80

 
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:17 pm
Thanked: 2 times in 2 posts

by outofstep80 » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:26 pm

MoapaPk wrote:Global warming.


It's the new Russia...Or U.S perspectively.

I was wondering if my employeer blocked the site. Work would get a whole lot slower.

User Avatar
Mark Doiron

 
Posts: 640
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:05 am
Thanked: 24 times in 11 posts

Re: What happened? Maintenance?

by Mark Doiron » Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:03 pm

Lolli wrote::shock:
Withdrawal symptoms!!

I guess I was the only one to remember the SP emergency forum ...

54 Emergency Forum

Not as good as the real thing by a long shot, but when you're desperate ...

User Avatar
JasonH

 
Posts: 6970
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 2:24 am
Thanked: 427 times in 295 posts

by JasonH » Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Catamount wrote:General rule of thumb ... if SP goes down when people in California are sleeping, the problem will be corrected when people from California wake up.


But I couldn't sleep damn it. I had nightmares about life with out SP.

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

by Bob Burd » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:26 pm

Catamount wrote:General rule of thumb ... if SP goes down when people in California are sleeping, the problem will be corrected when people from California wake up.


Sort of. Matt is in Washington State (or is it Oregon?), and he's the only one (besides the Gods Who are Heard of No More [Josh/Ryle]) that can fix it. Same time zone, though.

no avatar
Dave K
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 7909
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 2:40 pm
Thanked: 77 times in 39 posts

by Dave K » Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:23 am

The word from Matt was that an Elf caused it by entering an invalid IP address when banning someone.


I swear it wasn't me. :lol:

no avatar
Dave K
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 7909
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 2:40 pm
Thanked: 77 times in 39 posts

by Dave K » Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:51 am

Well, it wouldn't surprise me if the deleted dude knew something like this would happen.





Either that or Aaron planned it all along. :wink:

no avatar
Dave K
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 7909
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 2:40 pm
Thanked: 77 times in 39 posts

by Dave K » Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:04 am

I dunno. It wouldn't surprise me since he has done a pretty good job of messing with things before.

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

by Bob Burd » Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:52 am

Dave K wrote:I dunno. It wouldn't surprise me since he has done a pretty good job of messing with things before.


Who is the "deleted dude" being talked about?

Word from Matt was that an elf entered an invalid IP address in the banning process. Numbers have to be less than 255 between the dots, but something like "407" was used. Of course that *shouldn't* take down the server, but apparently there is a bad error trap or something, and it does just that. Anyway, I don't see how it could have been done by a rogue member, deleted or otherwise. Probably an elf error. Not sure which one, though. So far, Dave and I are professing innocence. :)

User Avatar
Day Hiker

 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 2:57 am
Thanked: 61 times in 43 posts

by Day Hiker » Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:18 am

Bob Burd wrote:. . . something like "407" was used.


Ah. Still safer than this, though:

Image

User Avatar
Vid Pogachnik
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2002 7:04 am
Thanked: 11 times in 9 posts

by Vid Pogachnik » Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:52 pm

Bob Burd wrote:
Dave K wrote:I dunno. It wouldn't surprise me since he has done a pretty good job of messing with things before.


Who is the "deleted dude" being talked about?

Word from Matt was that an elf entered an invalid IP address in the banning process. Numbers have to be less than 255 between the dots, but something like "407" was used. Of course that *shouldn't* take down the server, but apparently there is a bad error trap or something, and it does just that. Anyway, I don't see how it could have been done by a rogue member, deleted or otherwise. Probably an elf error. Not sure which one, though. So far, Dave and I are professing innocence. :)


Me too. Wasn't banning anyone.

User Avatar
Aaron Johnson

 
Posts: 3647
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 8:49 pm
Thanked: 62 times in 21 posts

by Aaron Johnson » Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:34 pm

was the deleted dude from a "familiar" IP address? That would be pretty shitty if they planned it that way.


I'm the one that caused all the trouble. I've since gone over the scenario with Matt. SP's system brought up the IP address of the offender, which has apparently caused much trouble here before. After writing it down, I simply copied it and pasted it into the ban IP address window and hit submit. I then went to bed. I had no idea SP had wigged out as a result of my action until the next day.

Matt and I have discussed the matter. He never thought a small three-digit number would have such a massive affect on the server, but it did. So yeah, I'll obviously be much more careful in the future (I was not aware of the 255 rule). We've come to the conclusion that this may have been a deliberate set-up, but there's no way to tell for sure. There are folks that are not only sore at me, but sore at SP in general and we'll just have to get through those matters as they come one at a time.

Anyway, my sincere apologies for this mishap, for the grief, anguish and extreme emotional trauma this may have caused our members. As for our members' spouses, Bryan Benn reports they were most pleased with this turn of events. I'll say to them, "you're most welcome!" :D

Next

Return to Site Feedback

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests