kamil wrote:I wouldn't nuke this one either.
Some others are already nuked and I can't be arsed looking for google copies...
Kamil,
This one hasn't been nuked as you see. And the others were worthless - if you can't believe it, get arsed looking
by yatsek » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:24 am
kamil wrote:I wouldn't nuke this one either.
Some others are already nuked and I can't be arsed looking for google copies...
by SoCalHiker » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:27 am
yatsek wrote:mrchad9 wrote:I also don't really see the point of deleting trip reports, unless the author is long gone AND it is obvious that the report is of absolutely no value.
You may be right but what's the SP value of a TR nobody has bothered to cast a vote on over six years?
by SoCalHiker » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:29 am
JasonH wrote:... Lack of votes shouldn't be grounds for deletion....
by mrchad9 » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:31 am
yatsek wrote:mrchad9 wrote:I also don't really see the point of deleting trip reports, unless the author is long gone AND it is obvious that the report is of absolutely no value.
You may be right but what's the SP value of a TR nobody has bothered to cast a vote on over six years?
by yatsek » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:34 am
JasonH wrote:yatsek wrote:mrchad9 wrote:I also don't really see the point of deleting trip reports, unless the author is long gone AND it is obvious that the report is of absolutely no value.
You may be right but what's the SP value of a TR nobody has bothered to cast a vote on over six years?
So, I have a lot of good stuff nobody votes on. Lack of votes shouldn't be grounds for deletion. Maybe low votes, but not no votes.
by chugach mtn boy » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:41 am
Bob Sihler wrote:sjarelkwint wrote:Instead of deleting them, can't you give them up for adopting? Might be a faster way to find new and better owners ...
People are aways willing to offer, but I'm not likely to make a lot of progress by waiting around for people to step up. It's easier to delete and make the mountain "available" to someone else. In the past few days, I've gotten rid of about 150 pages of various sorts; now someone else is free to start anew.
by mrchad9 » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:45 am
chugach mtn boy wrote:Bob Sihler wrote:sjarelkwint wrote:Instead of deleting them, can't you give them up for adopting? Might be a faster way to find new and better owners ...
People are aways willing to offer, but I'm not likely to make a lot of progress by waiting around for people to step up. It's easier to delete and make the mountain "available" to someone else. In the past few days, I've gotten rid of about 150 pages of various sorts; now someone else is free to start anew.
Wow, what a whirlwind you've had going on over here!! There's a bit of a downside to it, though. I see you nuked Top Notch Peak in the Absarokas, which was a poor but not useless page about a peak that isn't totally obscure--it has some interest to the general public. I had signed the summit log and could probably have picked it up and upgraded to at least minimum standards. But I wouldn't want to start from scratch due to lack of photos.
Not all of us watch the threads like hawks. When preparing to nuke a page that's not just a shell, I wonder if it might be worth notifying active SPers who have commented, signed the summit log, or otherwise shown a prior interest in the page with a form PM that says they have 48 hours to respond if they'd like to adopt.
by Bob Sihler » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:46 am
kamil wrote:Yatsek, hold your horses! There are loads of route pages with few photos but decent description and old TRs with no pics like that... some new TRs have less text than those but a shitload of fancy pics and get loads of 10s or even make it to the front page!
BTW I liked the old smileys a lot more than those
by kamil » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:49 am
yatsek wrote:kamil wrote:I wouldn't nuke this one either.
Some others are already nuked and I can't be arsed looking for google copies...
Kamil,
This one hasn't been nuked as you see. And the others were worthless - if you can't believe it, get arsed looking
by Bob Sihler » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:55 am
JasonH wrote:yatsek wrote:mrchad9 wrote:I also don't really see the point of deleting trip reports, unless the author is long gone AND it is obvious that the report is of absolutely no value.
You may be right but what's the SP value of a TR nobody has bothered to cast a vote on over six years?
So, I have a lot of good stuff nobody votes on. Lack of votes shouldn't be grounds for deletion. Maybe low votes, but not no votes.
by yatsek » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:56 am
kamil wrote:Now its author will become an SP star, a local hero, an innocent victim of the new broom. Let's start an initiative towards bringing back the nuked TR!
by Bob Sihler » Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:11 am
chugach mtn boy wrote:There's a bit of a downside to it, though. I see you nuked Top Notch Peak in the Absarokas, which was a poor but not useless page about a peak that isn't totally obscure--it has some interest to the general public. I had signed the summit log and could probably have picked it up and upgraded to at least minimum standards. But I wouldn't want to start from scratch due to lack of photos.
Not all of us watch the threads like hawks. When preparing to nuke a page that's not just a shell, I wonder if it might be worth notifying active SPers who have commented, signed the summit log, or otherwise shown a prior interest in the page with a form PM that says they have 48 hours to respond if they'd like to adopt.
by Bob Sihler » Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:14 am
yatsek wrote:kamil wrote:Now its author will become an SP star, a local hero, an innocent victim of the new broom. Let's start an initiative towards bringing back the nuked TR!
Kamil, you'd better do some cleaning in your EC European home.
BTW
http://www.summitpost.org/route/158882/ ... stick.html
http://www.summitpost.org/hut/campgroun ... ienok.html
http://www.summitpost.org/hut/campgroun ... ierom.html
http://www.summitpost.org/hut/campgroun ... chata.html
http://www.summitpost.org/hut/campgroun ... achom.html
http://www.summitpost.org/hut/campgroun ... chata.html
http://www.summitpost.org/hut/campgroun ... chata.html
http://www.summitpost.org/hut/campgroun ... 318-a.html
http://www.summitpost.org/route/480177/pp-variant.html
http://www.summitpost.org/hut/campgroun ... chata.html
by kamil » Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:16 am
by MarkDidier » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:09 am
SoCalHiker wrote:I completely agree with Chad. You should look at trip reports different than at mountains/areas/routes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests