mvs wrote:How about people who write TRs who never climbed it?
They must be the greatest sources of inspiration.
by yatsek » Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:35 pm
mvs wrote:How about people who write TRs who never climbed it?
by Bob Sihler » Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:45 am
by lcarreau » Fri Oct 22, 2010 2:28 am
by Bob Sihler » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:25 am
tazz wrote:well...even the mod thinks it is fine to post a pm with other members names and info in it....so UNCOOL!
by mrchad9 » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:43 am
by lcarreau » Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:56 am
by dadndave » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:35 am
by lcarreau » Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:02 am
dadndave wrote:
I just took it to a dark corner to hose it out a bit.
by Proterra » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:50 am
dadndave wrote:Nope.
I just took it to a dark corner to hose it out a bit.
It's now handed back to those who were innocently carrying on on a civilised conversation.
I've tried to leave it as coherent as possible, so if you think there are inconsistencies in what I left in and what I took out, you're probably right but that's the reason.
Normal service is now resumed.
by yatsek » Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:24 pm
by Fred Spicker » Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:51 pm
yatsek wrote:AFAIR Fred Spicker said he'd rather the "owner" were renamed "maintainer". I think I'd be in favour of RH or RB for Responsibility Holder/Bearer/Bear.
by yatsek » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:08 pm
Fred Spicker wrote:yatsek wrote:AFAIR Fred Spicker said he'd rather the "owner" were renamed "maintainer". I think I'd be in favour of RH or RB for Responsibility Holder/Bearer/Bear.
That is not what I said. I pointed out that on SP1 the people with pages were called the "maintainer". I did not advocate for a change. The present system is what it is and changes were discussed and decided at the time of the change to SP2.
by mrchad9 » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:14 pm
by yatsek » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:18 pm
mrchad9 wrote:What do you mean by seventh bar? Where?
by mrchad9 » Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:23 pm
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 0 guests