by Luc » Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:56 am
by mrchad9 » Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:18 am
by TimB » Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:49 pm
by Luc » Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:59 pm
by Buz Groshong » Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:02 pm
The Chief wrote:anita wrote:I appreciate any photos that do not include stupid dogs, flowers I can find in my yard, farms/villages, dusty/lame scenery and self-portraits.
Like this lot that is over 60% of this individuals contritbutions.....?
What is really ironic about your claim is that some of those "self portraits" got high scores via the bullshit voting system. Just goes to show how quality not quantity as you state in your post, does not prevail.
by Buz Groshong » Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:23 pm
anita wrote:I appreciate any photos that do not include stupid dogs, flowers I can find in my yard, farms/villages, dusty/lame scenery and self-portraits.
by mrchad9 » Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:31 pm
Buz Groshong wrote:anita wrote:I appreciate any photos that do not include stupid dogs, flowers I can find in my yard, farms/villages, dusty/lame scenery and self-portraits.
I would also add to that exclusion list photos that look like they should be painted on black velvet. (over-saturated photos)
by lcarreau » Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:46 pm
anita wrote:I appreciate any photos that do not include stupid dogs, flowers I can find in my yard, farms/villages, dusty/lame scenery and self-portraits.
by Josh Lewis » Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:42 pm
by Marmaduke » Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:15 pm
by Josh Lewis » Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:43 pm
by lcarreau » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:44 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests