good overview page with beasic and important information! For better reading the list of mountains and ascents could be formatted as a tableboard. The numbers of the mountains in the map should be named somewhere in the text.
Yes, agree with all the others about re-organising the information to make it a bit easier to read.
Otherwise, well done. It's good to see information about a real mountain area, and one that is not so well known. I have read about the Raura in old alpine journals but you don't see much about it nowadays.
Mathias Zehring - Apr 22, 2006 5:49 am - Voted 9/10
good overview pagegood overview page with beasic and important information! For better reading the list of mountains and ascents could be formatted as a tableboard. The numbers of the mountains in the map should be named somewhere in the text.
John Climber - Apr 22, 2006 9:52 pm - Voted 9/10
Check the height5 meters should be 5.000 I think !
Good job. The 'Mountain Routes'section is a little bit difficult to read. Maybe a tab or so could be useful.
Damien Gildea - May 2, 2006 10:41 am - Voted 9/10
Good JobYes, agree with all the others about re-organising the information to make it a bit easier to read.
Otherwise, well done. It's good to see information about a real mountain area, and one that is not so well known. I have read about the Raura in old alpine journals but you don't see much about it nowadays.
Corax - Jun 1, 2006 8:52 am - Hasn't voted
C de RauraGood page.
What about the red tape for the area?
That section is empty.