Welcome to SP!  -
Drinking Water in the Backcountry
Article
 
Children 
Parents 
Articles
 

Drinking Water in the Backcountry

  Featured on the Front Page
Drinking Water in the Backcountry

Page Type: Article

Object Title: Drinking Water in the Backcountry

 

Page By: Enkidu

Created/Edited: May 9, 2012 / May 13, 2012

Object ID: 789170

Hits: 7774 

Page Score: 93.51%  - 43 Votes 

Vote: Log in to vote

 

Introduction

 
Mt Meru Acclimatization Hike
 
Travel in remote areas can often present hydration challenges that are often compounded by weather, elevation and exertion. Often times the only water available is from the nearest lake/stream or snow/ice. In certain instances these sources can be used successfully without any treatment. In other cases successful use requires some form of treatment.

Success in terms of drinking water can be defined as follows:

The quantity of water available is sufficient to prevent dehydration and the quality of the water is such that the health risk from consumption of the water is acceptable.

The next question automatically becomes what is an acceptable health risk? In general terms, most people would agree that so long as consumption does not create any unwanted side effects than the risk is acceptable.

This is where things become complicated . The ability of an individual's immune system to ward off waterborne pathogens varies greatly from one person to the next. For example a sewage system operator may be able to consume 1000's of pathogenic organisms with impunity due to workplace vaccination and repeated exposure to various pathogens. A normal healthy person may be able to consume only 100 of the same pathogenic organisms before becoming sick. Lastly a person with HIV, cancer or other immune system disorders may not be able to consume any pathogens.

Ultimately an acceptable risk level is determined individually. The following article examines the different types of pathogens commonly encountered, the methods available for disinfection and the pros and cons for each method. The article does not recommend any specific product but instead strives to provide you with the information necessary to make an educated choice regarding your drinking water in the backcountry.

A few words on my qualifications. I am a civil engineer with a specialty in water and wastewater treatment. I own a small company that specializes in the design, construction and operation of treatment facilities. I typically split my time between North American projects and projects in the developing world (usually Africa and the Asian "Stans").

Waterborne Threats

Waterborne disease threats come in two forms:

- Chemical
- Biological

 
Contaminant Source
Biological Contaminant Source
Chemical contamination of water can be caused naturally (usually a function of the local geology) or by manmade sources such as agriculture and industry. In cases of natural contamination, the chemical concentration is usually low enough that, short term exposure does not result in adverse side effects. Fortunately most manmade sources of contamination are usually located far enough from backcountry areas that chemical concentrations are once again low enough that short term exposure is not a concern. In the event that significant chemical contamination is suspected than options become very limited - either find a different source or live with it. There are no small scale portable methods that reliably remove all the different types of chemical contamination that can occur.

Biological threats are a common occurrence in the backcountry, fortunately there are simple methods to reduce or eliminate this risk. The remainder of this article examines some of the pathogens that may be present in the backcountry and the methods available to mitigate the associated risk.

The Usual Suspects (A.K.A. Pathogens)

There are three major classes of microbial pathogens. In order of increasing size they are as follows:

- Viruses
- Bacteria
- Protozoa

Essentially all waterborne microbial pathogens fall into one of these three categories. Specific characteristics and common examples are discussed further in the following sections. Not all specific pathogen species are described as this would make the article unsuitably long, however the control methods described in the "Treatment Options" section of the article are specific to each general group i.e. if a treatment method is described as being effective for viruses than it is effective for all species of virus, or if effective for bacteria than it is effective for all species of bacteria etc.

Viral Pathogens


 
Norwalk
Norovirus (NLV) - Horizontal bar is 0.1 microns
- Smallest and simplest life forms to reproduce and infect
- Require a host cell to replicate
- Known viral pathogens are from human fecal sources
- Can only move via passive transport (e.g. stream current or the bottom of a boot)
- Very small size 0.020 to 0.100 microns (a micron is 1/1,000,000 of a meter - to put this in context, human hair is 40 to 50 microns in diameter and a hydrogen atom is about 0.0001 microns in diameter)
- Examples include norovirus(NLV), hepatitis A, polio and rotavirus

It is estimated that 90% of gastroenteritis cases not caused by bacteria are the result of NLV. NLV is of particular concern in areas such as base camps as humans are the only known host and close contact facilitates transmission. Other properties of NLV that are of concern:

- Can survive freezing
- Very infectious (low number of organisms required to cause illness)
- Very persistent in water
- Rapid onset (12 to 48 hours after exposure)
- Causes vomiting and diarrhoea

Bacterial Pathogens


 
E. Coli.
E. Coli
 
Camphylobacter
Camphylobacter
- Require an aqueous environment to thrive
- Reproduce by binary fission, numbers can grow explosively
- Use the warm, nutrient-rich environment of the gut to reproduce and are shed in feces
- Size range is from 0.3 to 2.0 microns
- Some are mobile with a whip-like flagellum
- Examples include Camphylobacter, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Vibrio Cholerae

Cholera
Cholera
Any of these bacteria may be present in the backcountry and can cause serious illness and even death in a small percentage of cases . Campyhlobacter is of particular interest as it has the widest range of animal hosts and is therefore most likely to be present. Properties of Camphylobacter that are of concern are:

- Survive best in cold water
- Incubation of 2 to 5 days
- Causes abdominal pain, headache, fever, nausea and vomiting
- Chronic complications occur in 1 to 2% of cases including arthritis, convulsions, and paralysis
- Fatality rate of 0.1% in the developed world

Protozoan Pathogens


 
Giardia Cyst
Giardia Cyst
 
Giardia Life Cylcle
Giardia Life Cycle
- Single-cell organism, but more complex than bacteria
- Reproduction involves a complex life cycle
- Can form cysts (single parasite) or oocysts (multiple parasites) that are resistant to environmental conditions
- Reproduction occurs when a cyst or oocyst finds a favourable environment
- Range in size from 2 to 50 microns
- Examples include Giardia (beaver fever), Cryptosporidium and Ameoba

Cryptosporidium Life Cycle
Cryptosporidium Life Cycle
Hosts for protozoa are widespread and include virtually all wildlife including land mammals, birds and reptiles. Cryptosporidium is of particular concern as there is no effective treatment. A healthy person will recover after 4 to 28 days of brutal diarrhoea. An individual with a comprised immune system however will develop a severe chronic infection that can be fatal. The organism survives particularly well in cold water and is essentially immune to chemical disinfectants.

The largest documented outbreak of waterborne disease in the history of the United States was attributed to cryptosporidium. In the city of Milwaukee in 1993 over 400,000 people were sickened and over 100 died due to cryptosporidium that was transmitted via the municipal water system.

Source Water Selection


 
Contaminated Water Source
Contaminated Water Source
The first step in providing safe drinking water is to select a source. Often times there is only one option and in this case the choice of source becomes a moot point. If there are multiple choices available than the source least likely to contain contaminants should be chosen. Choosing the best source essentially comes down to applying common sense. In general terms (there may be site specific exceptions) source water quality would be ranked from best to worst as follows:

- Drilled well (not usually an option) - often (but not always) considered potable without treatment
- Snow in alpine areas - often (but not always) considered potable without treatment
- Ice in alpine areas - often (but not always) considered potable without treatment
- Clear cold (4C or 40F and less) alpine surface water from non-stagnant water bodies - may be potable without treatment but treatment is usually recommended
- Warm (above cold temperature limit) alpine surface water from non-stagnant water bodies - treatment is recommended
- Non-alpine surface water from non-stagnant water bodies - treatment required
- Surface water from stagnant sources such as swamps or beaver ponds - treatment required.

In all cases the source should be located upstream from any human or animal activity, if possible.

Springs are not mentioned in the above list as they can range from close to top of the list to just above the bottom of the list depending on local geology conditions. For example a spring may be fed from glacier melt water via rock fractures (good) or it may be fed from a perched stagnant swamp through rock fractures (bad).

Treatment Options

Treatment of drinking water in the backcountry can be grouped into five general categories as follows:

- Boiling or pasteurization
- Filtration
- Enhanced Filtration (sometimes marketed as purification)
- Ultraviolet irradiation
- Chemical disinfection

An important point to note is that when used properly treatment provides disinfection. This is different than sterilization. Disinfection is a percent removal or inactivation of pathogens. Generally speaking the treatment process will aim to reliably remove/inactivate 99.9% to 99.99% of viable pathogens after treatment. If the source was properly selected than this will reduce the pathogen load in the water to a level that can be consumed by most healthy people. Sterilization on the other hand refers to the destruction/inactivation of all life in a given sample. An example of this would be an autoclave machine at a hospital used to sterilize surgical instruments. Due to the difficulty involved in trying to kill every last pathogen sterilization is considered impractical in the backcountry.

Boiling and Pasteurization

This is the simplest way to treat water and involves boiling the water (rolling boil required) for 2 minutes or heating the water to 65C (150F) for 5 minutes. This method is effective against all forms of pathogens and works even if the water appears dirty or cloudy. The unfortunate drawbacks to this method are the time and fuel required.

Filtration

Portable water filters have been available from outfitters for decades and vast improvements have been made in efficiency and performance since they were first introduced. Filters are usually rated based on the pore (opening) size of the filter. The pore size is typically given in microns, however this number can be misleading as there are different methods for determining the pore size. The pore size is usually described as nominal, average or absolute.

Nominal pore size means that about 70% of particles, at the rating size and larger, will be retained by the filter. The remaining 30%, at the rating size and larger, will pass through the filter. Essentially nominal just means that at the rating size the filter operates at about 70% efficiency. Average means that openings can vary from much larger to much smaller than the rating. Essentially average tells you nothing about a filters ability to remove a particle of a given size. Absolute means that all particles above the rated opening size will be removed.

Therefore when choosing a filter the absolute pore size must be known. Filters currently on the market offer absolute ratings as low as 0.2 microns. At 0.2 microns, filtration will effectively remove protozoan and bacterial pathogens but is not effective against viral agents. If the source water you are using is not subject to contamination from human fecal sources than a filter (preferably 0.2 micron absolute) is a good choice as virtually all waterborne viral agents are from human sources. An absolute rating between 0.2 and 1.0 microns is effective against protozoan pathogens but is not considered effective against bacterial and viral pathogens. A filter in this category may be appropriate depending on the source quality and the immunity of the individual drinking the water. Other factors to consider when choosing a filter are:

- Flow rate capacity of the filter
- Filter capacity (how much water can be pumped before filter element requires replacement or cleaning)
- Robustness (The filter ratings were determined in a laboratory - not in the backcountry. How will the filter perform after being dropped, stepped on, freeze-thaw cycles, even water temperature can adversely affect the filter performance, etc.)
- Pre-filtration may be required for water containing a lot of suspended matter (turbidity). This will prevent premature filter clogging. I like to use coffee filters or paper towel for this as they provide about 15 micron pre-filtration and are inexpensive and light.

Enhanced Filtration (Purification)

 
Climb to Survive
Bedrock Spring
Enhanced filtration is essentially a 0.2 micron absolute filter with a selective media added post filter. The selective media is usually some type of resin that has a weak electrostatic charge. The viruses adhere to the resin because they have a weak negative charge. As the name implies these types of filters do provide a higher level of protection than filtration alone and can be used to provide adequate protection against viruses.

Now for the caveats:

- the other factors mentioned for filtration also apply to enhanced filtration
- In order to guarantee their performance maintenance is critical as there are numerous other contaminants that also have a negative charge. The result is the resin or media can quickly become exhausted depending on the water quality. Manufacturers recommendations must be followed.
- Make sure that the chosen purifier is "certified to" or "meets the requirements of" the US EPA standard for virus removal/inactivation.
- One last item, if the water being treated is cold the performance of these type of purifiers is greatly reduced and it may be necessary to substanstially reduce the flow rate through the purifier or pump the water through twice.

Ultraviolet Irradiation (UV)

 
UV Lamp
UV Lamp
In the last 15 years battery powered UV disinfection systems have become a viable choice for some situations in the backcountry. The process uses ultraviolet light with a very specific wavelength of 0.254 micrometers (microns). This wavelength of UV light has germicidal properties that inactivate pathogens by damaging their DNA. The damaged DNA does not kill the pathogen but instead prevents the pathogen from reproducing. If a pathogen is unable to reproduce it does not cause illness or infection but instead passes harmlessly through the body.



UV can be effective against all types of pathogens but does have limitations. The limitations are summarized below:

- The water must be free from suspended particulate. Suspended particles can shield pathogens by directly blocking light transmission
- If the water contains dissolved (not always visible - usually at the molecular level) matter the UV light can be absorbed (think of it as sunglasses that block UV light). This can in severe cases reduce the UV dose by a factor of 2 to 20. In these cases UV can still be effective by using the device for a period 2 to 20 times longer than would normally be required. If the water in question is visibly tinted than this is a sure sign that the water contains dissolved solids and a longer exposure time will be required. Make sure you read the manufacturers specifications/directions as this may be addressed in the manual.
- Check with the manufacturer to make sure that the recommended exposure is effective against viruses - if you are concerned about viral threats. If the manufacturer indicates that the recommended exposure only works for protozoa and bacteria than the exposure time must be increased by a factor of 8 to adequately inactivate viruses.

Chemical Disinfection

Disinfection using some type of chemical additive has been used in the water treatment industry for over 100 years. The common characteristic that all chemical disinfectants share is that they are oxidants. Addition of the oxidant causes inactivation of the pathogen through one of, or a combination of the following:

 
E. Coli. Section
E. Coli X-Section
- disruption of respiratory and transport function
- DNA damage
- protein coat damage
- capsid function impairment

The different types of chemicals can come in liquid, powder or pill form. In all cases the chemical is added to and mixed into the water until dissolved. Once the chemical is dissolved a period of time must pass before the water is considered disinfected. The length of time required is a function of the chemical used and the dose applied. Make sure the manufacturers recommendations are followed as the time required is critical.

Some of the typical chemicals on the market include:

- Free chlorine - usually produced from pelletized or powdered calcium hypochlorite. Sometimes produced with sodium hypochlorite solution (this is essentially bleach but possibly at a different solution strength)
- Combined chlorine (also called chloramine) - can be in pellet, powder or liquid form. This is free chlorine that has been combined with ammonia. The causes the chlorine to persist in the water for much longer periods. The drawback is that it is a much weaker disinfectant and is not usually used for the initial disinfection. This may see use in a base camp where large quantities of water are required. In these cases the water would be initially disinfected using some other method and the chloramine would be added to prevent regrowth.
- Chlorine dioxide - can be in pellet, powder or liquid form. This is a very strong disinfectant that rapidly inactivates most pathogens
- Ozone - a powerful gaseous oxidant that can only be produced on site with electricity. Not usually done in the backcountry unless you are at a base camp that has a reliable electricity source.
- Iodine - a powerful oxidant that is available in liquid or solid form.
- Mixed oxidant - a mixture of oxidants produced by a battery powered probe and a chemical additive (usually salt).

There are numerous other chemical options on the market. These are just some of the more common ones. With the exception of chloramine all of the oxidants listed above are effective against viral and bacteriaI pathogens. Chloramine can be used after initial disinfection as means to prevent regrowth. The only oxidant considered effective against protozoa is chlorine dioxide. Even with chlorine dioxide 4 hours or more may be required to inactivate protozoa if the water is cold. In all cases follow the manufactures directions as temperature and suspended solids (dirt) can greatly affect the disinfection process.

Conclusions

Before heading into the backcountry know the options available for obtaining safe drinking water. From the available options select the source with the highest quality that can also meet quantity requirements. As part of the source selection conduct an assessment to determine the origin of any threats i.e. animal or human or both in nature. If you are confident that there are no animal or human sources of contamination and you are healthy with no underlying health concerns than treatment can be at your own discretion. If animal contaminant sources are suspected but no human sources are suspected than use a treatment method that can deal with protozoan and bacterial threats. If both animal and human sources of contamination are suspected than chose a method or combination of methods that removes/inactivates protozoan, bacterial and viral pathogens. If you are unsure or not confident in your threat assessment than ask others who have been to the area before, or if all else fails, just boil it.

Images

Mt Meru Acclimatization Hike

Comments


[ Post a Comment ]
Viewing: 21-30 of 30 « PREV 1 2 NEXT »

markhallamGreat article!

markhallam

Voted 10/10

Another example underlining the usefulness of the diversity of SP member backgrounds, with you as an expert in the treatment of contaminated water. Anyway, a really useful article for anyone venturing into the back country, but I'd say especially for those planning expeditions - so I have taken the liberty of attaching yours as a child of my article on "Expedition Medicine". (you may want to have a look at what I have written on water purification - I think I didn't emphasize enough the impact of viruses - but I will when I get round to updating my article at some point).
Best wishes, Mark
Posted May 20, 2012 2:40 am

EnkiduRe: Great article!

Enkidu

Hasn't voted

Thanks for the feedback. I read your article while writing this one. There is is a ton of good stuff there. Best regards, Joe.
Posted May 20, 2012 11:22 am

Jukka AhonenDifferent locations?

Jukka Ahonen

Voted 10/10

Hello,

First of all, thank you for the article - very comprehensive and well written!

I wonder, though, how much different locations differ from each other in regards to water quality?

I have been hiking actively for about 15 years now, and especially in Northern Finland I drink straight from any flowing, clear body of water which is at least 1 day away from human settlement.

If no flowing water is available, I will opt for clear water from lakes (preferably large), but not from the top layer.

I have never suffered any ill effects, nor has anyone of my friends or fellow hikers.

Could it be that Northern Lapland is cold enough to resemble Alpine conditions in this sense? I would not recommend such a happy-go-lucky approach to drinking water anywhere outside Scandinavia, though.
Posted May 20, 2012 5:16 am

EnkiduRe: Different locations?

Enkidu

Hasn't voted

Thanks for the visit and vote.

There can be huge variation due to geography but also due to season. The lower the wildlife density (typically lower in cold climates) the lower the chances for contamination. The other factor that can have a large impact is natural immunity. Depending on how you were raised, your diet, genetics, living conditions, job etc the variation between healthy adults can be enormous.

Best Regards, Joe
Posted May 20, 2012 11:38 am

WastralMissed treatment method

Hasn't voted

A widely used treatment method to obtain 150F water for 5 minutes or greater temperatures can be seen in all of the myriad of solar heat collectors.

Generally said system is a simple tray with its Bottom painted JET BLACK and then one carries stiff aluminum foil or cardboard aluminized foil that directs the sunlight onto the water tray. This heats the water to the correct temperature without any fuel consumed. The fancy ones have a temperature guage that turns a color when it reaches 160F, then you time it for 5-10min and viola out pops 2 liters or so of clean water. Weight is generally about a pound when all is said and done for the lightweight systems and for the food solar cooker, an earthenware pot of a couple pounds to pots painted jet black to 10 lbs and several gallons in size.

These system are prolific in Africa/middle east/equatorial islands, etc. Obvious requirement is dependable sun. Also works perfectly well depending on the season very far north. Farthest North I have personally heard is British Columbia. California/Colorado would be simple I would think. Same with the Blue Smmoky Mountains and the EU alps.
Posted May 20, 2012 7:16 pm

EnkiduRe: Missed treatment method

Enkidu

Hasn't voted

This method was not missed as this is simply a pasteurization technique. Boiling and pasteurization are one of the 5 general methodologies covered in the article. I think you mean that I did not specifically mention these type of devices.

Similarly I did not mention fires or stoves as the purpose of the article was not to suggest a specific device or product but to provide the reader with the information necessary to select a treatment methodology (pasteurization in this case) based on their specific situation. The reader can than chose the specific system they intend to use based on their own specific preferences.

Posted May 20, 2012 8:55 pm

JoelSkokJust like a college lecture...

JoelSkok

Voted 10/10

...only way better, coming from someone I can identify with. Really good--thanks for sharing your considerable breadth of knowledge, and for talking with us, not down to us.

Almost 30 years ago when I was in the Dominican Republic for two years in "el campo" I made an inconsistent yet purposeful effort to purify my water with iodine tablets. The reasons for the inconsistency are three: 1) Didn't like the taste 2) Didn't want the offend those that offered me food and drink every single day as I passed through their villages 3) Over the course of time thought I was able to judge a clean water source from and unclean source.

I paid dearly for both my sensitivity to my hosts and lack of judgement and/or discipline. I suspect it was Giardia that throttled me the worst, the sulphur belches rank among the low points of my life. Yet even at the time my regrets were few. Balancing personal health with a robust experience is not easy. 30 years later I wonder just how much more careful I would be? How does that saying go? "You can take a man out of the country but you can't take the country out of the man." I don't want to come across as arrogant about this, please understand that I struggled with this issue!

Thanks for the time you took to write that article. It was very well done. You have my respect.
Posted May 30, 2012 10:18 pm

EnkiduRe: Just like a college lecture...

Enkidu

Hasn't voted

Funny you would say that as I used to teach part time in the civil engineering faculty at a local college. That was shortly after I started my business and for the first few years I needed a little extra cash to keep things afloat. I guess the teaching habits I picked up are still in my head somewhere.
Posted May 30, 2012 10:51 pm

robertjoyCooties don't scare me!

robertjoy

Hasn't voted

For the past 10 years I have not filtered or purified water. I hike in the Columbia Gorge in winter and drink from streams, and I climb Northwest mountains in the summer, and drink from streams and glacier melt and alpine lakes. I have never gotten sick, and neither has my wife. I feel that choosing your water source prudently is a reasonable precaution. You are more likely to get backcountry giardiasis from lax hygiene practices than from drinking tainted water.
http://www.ridgenet.net/~rockwell/Giardia.pdf
Posted Jun 5, 2012 6:44 pm

EnkiduRe: Cooties don't scare me!

Enkidu

Hasn't voted

This is in agreement with the source selection portion of the article. 4 of the 7 seven source types described often do not require treatment. The purpose of describing the various treatment options is for those cases when these types of sources are not available - typically in the developing world where livestock control and personal hygiene habits are questionable, in base camp settings where there is a concentration of people, or in lower altitude settings where mammal concentrations are higher.
Posted Jun 5, 2012 9:33 pm

Viewing: 21-30 of 30 « PREV 1 2 NEXT »