You must have had to spend a ton of hours putting this together.
Very impressive Sir Sacha. Very impressive indeed and thank you, it is a great resource for us prominence baggers.
Well it helped having my Nevada outline. I could use that to help aid the process. Nevada took a few weeks to do. But California took a less than a week since I knew the process.
Not trying to be a bummer on a great page. I just wanted to suggest a few corrections. First, the elevation and prominence of San Gorgonio are incorrect. Second, a few peaks are listed as not having SP pages, though they exist here are two:
King Peak:
www.summitpost.org/mountain/rock/150518/king-s-peak.html
You've got Otay at 3572 but the BM is 3566. Is there a different map you're using or is this an elevation error on your list? At 3566, Otay's prominence would be 2086P (clean).
Dean - Oct 26, 2009 12:15 pm - Voted 10/10
Are you kidding me?You must have had to spend a ton of hours putting this together.
Very impressive Sir Sacha. Very impressive indeed and thank you, it is a great resource for us prominence baggers.
redsplashman23 - Oct 26, 2009 12:50 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Are you kidding me?Well it helped having my Nevada outline. I could use that to help aid the process. Nevada took a few weeks to do. But California took a less than a week since I knew the process.
Dean - Oct 30, 2009 9:41 am - Voted 10/10
Neat resourceI've already used this a couple times to check out peaks I'm interested in. Thank you again.
redsplashman23 - Oct 30, 2009 12:09 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Neat resourceNo Problem Dean. It makes life easier to have a central place for all these Resources. Thanks SP Members.
Bubba Suess - Nov 1, 2009 10:21 am - Voted 10/10
DataNot trying to be a bummer on a great page. I just wanted to suggest a few corrections. First, the elevation and prominence of San Gorgonio are incorrect. Second, a few peaks are listed as not having SP pages, though they exist here are two:
King Peak:
www.summitpost.org/mountain/rock/150518/king-s-peak.html
Thurston Peak:
www.summitpost.org/mountain/rock/212650/thurston-peak.html
Minor things on a great page!
redsplashman23 - Nov 1, 2009 12:29 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: DataThanks Bubba, I missed those on my 1st audit and didn't catch those other 2 summits with pages. It's fixed now.
Thanks again. And thanks for the vote!
Bubba Suess - Nov 1, 2009 11:47 pm - Voted 10/10
Re: DataNot trying to uber nit-pick here, but #112 Mt. Konocti is in Lake County. This page obviously took a lot of work and is a great resource. Thanks!
Klenke - Jan 10, 2010 10:38 pm - Hasn't voted
Orizaba errorThe wrong height is listed for this peak. It's not that high.
Klenke - Jul 13, 2010 1:25 am - Hasn't voted
Otay errorYou've got Otay at 3572 but the BM is 3566. Is there a different map you're using or is this an elevation error on your list? At 3566, Otay's prominence would be 2086P (clean).
redsplashman23 - Jul 14, 2010 7:32 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Otay errorI used Peaklist P2000 sheet as a resource that had that: http://www.peaklist.org/USlists/CAP2000.html
hgrapid - May 16, 2016 1:47 pm - Voted 10/10
Dixie MountainI added Dixie Mountain