Before deciding HOW to change the system, it first makes sense to determine IF it should be changed (and to determine if there is community and programming support for such a change).
Well?
by mrchad9 » Thu Jul 28, 2011 11:10 pm
by Alpinist » Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:48 pm
by mrchad9 » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:52 pm
by Josh Lewis » Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:05 pm
by Hotoven » Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:31 pm
by Josh Lewis » Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:01 am
by Josh Lewis » Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:44 pm
by Luc » Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:18 pm
by mrchad9 » Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:24 pm
by Josh Lewis » Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:20 pm
by Arthur Digbee » Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:16 pm
by Buz Groshong » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:23 pm
by Bob Sihler » Sat Aug 27, 2011 6:53 pm
Buz Groshong wrote:The problem isn't the voting system; it's the voters! The scoring method would probably work quite well if everyone didn't consider anything less than a 10 to be a negative vote. It gives me a relative idea of what people think of my work and that's good enough for me.
by Buz Groshong » Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:40 pm
Bob Sihler wrote:Buz Groshong wrote:The problem isn't the voting system; it's the voters! The scoring method would probably work quite well if everyone didn't consider anything less than a 10 to be a negative vote. It gives me a relative idea of what people think of my work and that's good enough for me.
But what makes many of us unhappy is that less than 10 lowers the score when many of us feel that something like 7 should leave the score unchanged, with 8, 9, and 10 making increases. I think many of us feel this way because it's what we got used to with grading systems in school-- 7 is a C (average), 8 a B, etc.
What makes it worse is that something less than 10 can sink a score way below what you would expect it to for that, and the effect is larger the higher your power is. For example, I just gave a test vote of 7 on a new image. The score was 50.34%. According to the guidelines, 7 is "Pretty Good," but it produces a score that would be a failing grade on a test. (I canceled the vote, by the way.)
Earlier this summer, someone pointed out a page that had three 7 votes. The score was in the 20's. I just can't think that's how the system was meant to work, or can't imagine that anyone would really expect people to like such a system if that indeed was the intent.
I agree with the idea of giving bigger contributors more weight, so I don't favor a Like option. Like some others, I'd prefer to see some tweaking with how 7, 8, and 9 are registered.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests