Looks like this could be very bad!
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/05 ... .html?_r=1
by sierraguy » Mon May 21, 2012 6:32 pm
by Diego Sahagún » Mon May 21, 2012 7:24 pm
by Cy Kaicener » Mon May 21, 2012 7:27 pm
by Hotoven » Tue May 22, 2012 3:04 pm
by sharperblue » Tue May 22, 2012 4:38 pm
by Cy Kaicener » Tue May 22, 2012 5:26 pm
by Marmaduke » Tue May 22, 2012 5:52 pm
sharperblue wrote:Everything that is wrong about this, and everything that needs to be said, can be summarized with one single photo. Here it is:
http://boingboing.net/wp-content/upload ... _line.jpeg
by Diego Sahagún » Tue May 22, 2012 5:55 pm
by sharperblue » Tue May 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Marmaduke wrote:sharperblue wrote:Everything that is wrong about this, and everything that needs to be said, can be summarized with one single photo. Here it is:
http://boingboing.net/wp-content/upload ... _line.jpeg
When do the guide companies start taking some of the responsibility in this? They should be less concerned with the amount of cash they make and the total successful summits and be more concerned with the least amount of fatalities.
by radson » Tue May 22, 2012 11:32 pm
by Damien Gildea » Tue May 22, 2012 11:39 pm
sharperblue wrote:... can you even begin to imagine telling some corporate executive what to do after they've shelled out 20-60k to go up there? Yeah, good luck with that!
by Marmaduke » Tue May 22, 2012 11:45 pm
radson wrote:From what I can gather none of the deaths have been from those climbing with 'guiding' companies.
by radson » Tue May 22, 2012 11:58 pm
by radson » Wed May 23, 2012 12:25 am
by sharperblue » Wed May 23, 2012 12:39 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests