by MoapaPk » Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:26 pm
by yatsek » Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:28 pm
Scott wrote:Entire Mountain Page:
...That's the only text added to the mountain page. Six 10/10 votes. Can't you at least wait to vote after seeing if the page is going to be any good? Or are you saying that the above is all the effort that should be put into a 10/10 mountain page?
by yatsek » Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:19 pm
Kiefer Thomas wrote:But, hey, sugar-coating doesn't do ANYONE any good. People just need to be more understanding and learn to accept [good] criticism as a tool for improvement. 6/10 shouldn't be viewed as a personal attack...it's representative of the time & quality put into a page. Nothing more.
by MoapaPk » Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:45 pm
by Dow Williams » Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:28 pm
by yatsek » Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:28 pm
MoapaPk wrote:I don't think SP can escape the current binary voting system of 10/10 or nothing. In a fair world, a lot of good pages would get an 8/10 or 9/10, but with the current system, that would sink such good pages below a lot of crap.
by Josh Lewis » Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:38 pm
Dow Williams wrote:If something you contributed does not get ranked first and foremost, then either it was unhelpful to the public (poorly written and organized) or unnecessary and of no use to the internet public (outdoor enthusiasts/climbers) at large to begin with.
by Dow Williams » Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:51 pm
by colinr » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:13 pm
by colinr » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:15 pm
by MoapaPk » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:21 pm
Dow Williams wrote: If something you contributed does not get ranked first {on google} and foremost, then either it was unhelpful to the public (poorly written and organized) or unnecessary and of no use to the internet public (outdoor enthusiasts/climbers) at large to begin with.
Dow Williams wrote:To be honest Moapa, I would have assumed you had more common sense than to let a character like 1000 pks motivate you to delete your beta/writings no matter what he said or did.
by Kiefer » Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:57 pm
ZeeJay wrote:He's received quite a few negative votes but not a single one of the people who down voted him has bothered to tell him why or suggest improvements unless they did so in a PM.
yatsek wrote:Kiefer Thomas wrote:But, hey, sugar-coating doesn't do ANYONE any good. People just need to be more understanding and learn to accept [good] criticism as a tool for improvement. 6/10 shouldn't be viewed as a personal attack...it's representative of the time & quality put into a page. Nothing more.
6/10 That's right-wing, chauvinist and authoritarian.
MoapaPk wrote:If you give a low vote, say why in the comments section, and indicate how the page owner might improve the page.
by MoapaPk » Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:40 am
yatsek wrote:MoapaPk wrote:I don't think SP can escape the current binary voting system of 10/10 or nothing. In a fair world, a lot of good pages would get an 8/10 or 9/10, but with the current system, that would sink such good pages below a lot of crap.
Sure. But some pages deserve to be sunk - with anything from 1-9/10.
by Josh Lewis » Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:47 am
Dow Williams wrote:you want google recognition, you have to earn it...and either that is your sole purpose for contributing here or you are truly wasting your time...
MoapaPk wrote:And what will happen is that a lot of crap pages will still get 10/10, and few good pages, that people actually read, will get a few 8/10.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests