The Subaru Thread

Minimally moderated forum for climbing related hearsay, misinformation, and lies.
User Avatar
mfox79

 
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:13 pm
Thanked: 10 times in 10 posts

by mfox79 » Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:57 pm

I am on my third Subaru, I have owned 2 Foresters and a Legacy all have been great cars the only down side to it is that when the road gets to rough I may have to walk a little further, oh well as Mooapeak said they where not built for that, and I feel the MPG makes up for it.

User Avatar
Day Hiker

 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 2:57 am
Thanked: 61 times in 43 posts

by Day Hiker » Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:15 pm

I put my car on ramps when I change its oil.

User Avatar
SpiderSavage

 
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:37 pm
Thanked: 9 times in 5 posts

by SpiderSavage » Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:12 pm

#1 car to have when the blizzard hits.

Nothing special in the warm and dry.

User Avatar
Saintgrizzly

 
Posts: 580
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 9:38 am
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

by Saintgrizzly » Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:01 am

erykmynn wrote:...friggin safety hippies


I don't even know what that is. But it sounds impressive. :roll:

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

by MoapaPk » Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:03 am

Dingus Milktoast wrote: Hmmm. Why WOULD a car be on a ramp???
DUH! SKID PLATE, OF COURSE!!!1111
DMT


Many outbacks have just 7.3" clearance -- yes, that's a problem, and it means that if you want to work underneath your car with a socket wrench, you have to put the car on ramps. Unless you are extremely thin and have a very small head.

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

by MoapaPk » Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:11 am

MikeTX wrote:I'm glad y'all are talking about this. Seems we're going to be in the market for a new vehicle very soon. I think we're considering a Forrester or an Xterra. If anyone's owned both before, I'd be interested in knowing what you did or didn't like about either.


The Xterra is a much more capable car for rough terrain; I don't own one, but have ridden in many. The odd thing, is that most places I've gone in XTerras, I've also gone in my outback.

I guess you have to rationalize the gas mileage issue, "the planet", etc. If you have a fuel-efficient car to drive around for most of your trips, and can afford a second, pick the second one so it is capable of going rough places.

There isn't that much highway mpg difference between an outback and an FJ cruiser -- 26 vs 21. And the FJ will get you a lot more places.

Edit: Actually, according to the Subaru site comparison, it's 26 mpg (Legacy Outback 2.5L) against 20 mpg (4.0L 4x4 AT FJ).
Last edited by MoapaPk on Sun Aug 23, 2009 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User Avatar
DukeJH

 
Posts: 694
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 11:12 am
Thanked: 50 times in 41 posts

by DukeJH » Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:13 pm

I get 30 mpg in my Outback making runs to Taos from Fort Worth with wifey, 3 kids, luggage, and gear. Of course I drive the speed limit and take the bike rack off. The Outback is not a rock crawler but it beat the heck out of my Ford F350 crew cab long bed 2WD diesel when it comes to getting up gnarly mountain roads.

I get between 25 and 27 usually around town.

User Avatar
jmatthys

 
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:47 am
Thanked: 3 times in 3 posts

by jmatthys » Sun Aug 30, 2009 5:17 pm

My 2010 2.6L outback is getting 29.5-30mpg (50/50 highway/surface streets)...Though I have a small sample size (4 fill ups)

User Avatar
littlefrantz

 
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:54 am
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

Subarus as the best!

by littlefrantz » Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:40 pm

Image

My 99' subaru impreza 2.5RS shivering in the Truckee snow.

And no, we're not all lesbians! Some of us just have dogs, like to do cool things in the snow, and don't want to get SUV's lest we look like we're desperate for babies.

User Avatar
Yeti

 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:27 pm
Thanked: 8 times in 8 posts

Re: Subarus as the best!

by Yeti » Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:20 pm

littlefrantz wrote:And no, we're not all lesbians!

I'm a lesbian, trapped in a mans body. Lucky me! :lol:

erykmynn wrote:why are they also, always the slowest passenger cars to end up behind on a mountain road.
I've won more racing trophies in my daily driver Outback than in my dedicated track car... Keep in mind that the turbo WRX is the most popular Rallcrosser car in world, and I had to turn faster times in my non-turbo pig. ;) The last time I went crawling up a proper rocky mountain road, I had to constantly stop tp let my buddy catch up... in his 4Runner.

That said, I have to concede that the average subaru owner belongs in public transit. Fortunately, we here are not average. ;)

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

by MoapaPk » Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:44 pm

The 2.5L subie automatics often slip into 2nd gear on any substantial hill; that makes them very gas-inefficient.

User Avatar
BeDrinkable

 
Posts: 447
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:23 pm
Thanked: 9 times in 8 posts

by BeDrinkable » Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:45 pm

Subarus. They're like punk rock, but they're cars.

User Avatar
Yeti

 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:27 pm
Thanked: 8 times in 8 posts

by Yeti » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:19 pm

MoapaPk wrote:The 2.5L subie automatics often slip into 2nd gear on any substantial hill; that makes them very gas-inefficient.
I often slip mine into 2nd, because it's got no balls. :lol:

Fun fact about 2001-2004 Subaru Automatics (and possibly more):
What your brochure told you: They have a computer controlled power distribution system, which "moves power from the wheels that slip to the wheels that grip".
What it didn't tell you: If you manually select 1st, 2nd, or Reverse, the system is locked in 50/50 front-rear distribution.

So, when the snow is bad or when you're offroading, keep in locked in 1 or 2. ;)

User Avatar
armorfoot

 
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:27 am
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

by armorfoot » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:29 pm

I miss my '90 Loyale Wagon. It did it all. Skijooring. Rallying. Impromptu Camp Site. The mechanic who killed it doing a botched timing belt job is still on my "list".

no avatar
mconnell

 
Posts: 7494
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2001 4:28 pm
Thanked: 338 times in 201 posts

by mconnell » Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:52 pm

Yeti wrote:
MoapaPk wrote:The 2.5L subie automatics often slip into 2nd gear on any substantial hill; that makes them very gas-inefficient.
I often slip mine into 2nd, because it's got no balls. :lol:

Fun fact about 2001-2004 Subaru Automatics (and possibly more):
What your brochure told you: They have a computer controlled power distribution system, which "moves power from the wheels that slip to the wheels that grip".
What it didn't tell you: If you manually select 1st, 2nd, or Reverse, the system is locked in 50/50 front-rear distribution.

So, when the snow is bad or when you're offroading, keep in locked in 1 or 2. ;)


That would explain why I can back down my driveway in the winter w/o slipping, but my wife's jeep is all over the place unless she puts it in 4wd low (which accomplishes the same thing).

PreviousNext

Return to Ethics, Spray, and Slander

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron