Viewing: 1-4 of 4
Scott

Scott - Feb 1, 2007 9:52 pm - Hasn't voted

Dupicate page

I hate to vote low, but this page is a duplicate.

Original Page

I still can see it having use since it's in a different language, but perhaps change it from a mountain page to custom object and attach it to the other page.

Also, the photos are great and should be attached to the other page.


nartreb

nartreb - Feb 1, 2007 10:38 pm - Voted 8/10

Re: Dupicate page

No, this one is fairly clearly a route, not a mountain page, despite one sentence in the firs paragraph. The mountain page has a "getting there" section which gets you to base camp, this one gives details for the face climb itself. (And in this case, unlike the Ala page, there is not any previous route page.) Seems to be a good decription too, though I know nothing about this mountain or route. It's just misclassified as a mountain page.

HB: j'aime bien la page, seulement elle devrait etre classifie come Route [itineraire], pas Mountain. Et elle serait plus utile si elle etait bilingue/trilingue.

Scott

Scott - Feb 1, 2007 11:13 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: Dupicate page

It's just misclassified as a mountain page.

I see. Since I don't read French so didn't know it was meant as just a route page. Anyway, perhaps email/PM him about his other page too since there is already a mountain page on that one too.

hbizot - Feb 2, 2007 7:20 am - Hasn't voted

Re: Dupicate page

OK, I classified in "route", you are right.

Viewing: 1-4 of 4
Return to 'Pico Polaco (face est)' main page