[ Post a Comment ]
|
 | ||
| kletterwebbi | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote ... | |
| Posted Mar 24, 2004 4:19 am | ||
| tlogan | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Beautiful page! | |
| Posted Mar 23, 2004 12:15 pm | ||
| ||
| kletterwebbi | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote ... | |
| Posted Mar 24, 2004 4:19 am | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Very good page, Stefan! I agree with Gabriele on the pictures but know that you have to take what you can find. I didn't even know the Plattkofel page had my picture as signature (didn't even remember to have posted it :-)). As for the Zahnkofel-pict, I think this one is a little sharper than the one you took. I simply love it that the Dolomite pages are coming together now! Gangolf | |
| Posted Mar 23, 2004 2:51 pm | ||
| Vid Pogachnik | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Yes, really. Our discussion led to the decision, that Schlern should go here. May be Gangolf can prepare a piece of text for you and you complete this subgroup page. | |
| Posted Mar 23, 2004 3:49 pm | ||
| ||
| kletterwebbi | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote ... | |
| Posted Mar 24, 2004 4:19 am | ||
| Mathias Zehring | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | your page shows deep knowledge and gives a perfect overview about the climbing possibilities. Thank you very much! height: either you should give your page the height of the highest point (3181 m) or all maintainers of groups's pages should chose 0 m. The big pictures look great but my computer has loading problems because of them. :-( As I wrote on the message board, for systematic reasons I'd like Schlern area to be integrated in your page. | |
| Posted Mar 23, 2004 4:25 pm | ||
| ||
| kletterwebbi | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Hi, thanks for the vote ... The height was an mistake, I've put in the 3181m. About the picture: my computer does have the same problem ... hmm. I'll change that ... The problem with Schlern ... let's see the result of the discussion at the message board. If we decide to add the Schlern to the Langkofel group I a can extend the page without problems. Cheers, Stefan | |
| Posted Mar 24, 2004 4:10 am | ||
| kletterwebbi | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks for the vote ... | |
| Posted Mar 24, 2004 4:18 am | ||
| noah | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice work. Tell you what would be good, if you could use that main photo and label the peaks. | |
| Posted Mar 24, 2004 7:18 am | ||
| ||
| kletterwebbi | Untitled Comment | |
Hasn't voted | Nice idea, I'll do that. Thanks for the vote. | |
| Posted Mar 24, 2004 8:48 am | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Not finished yet! Thanks anyway :-) | |
| Posted Nov 25, 2005 1:45 am | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 |  | |
| Posted Nov 29, 2005 3:15 am | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Thanks Claude! | |
| Posted Nov 29, 2005 9:18 am | ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Thanks Livio, also for pointing out the error. It only appeared in IE so I hadn't seen it before. It took quite a while to fix it - I didn't find the error but copied the picture links from somewhere else and replaced the numbers. The problem was somewhere with the two picts of Ciampanil Innerkofler | |
| Posted Dec 4, 2005 3:46 am | ||
| tiziana | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Nice one! | |
| Posted Dec 5, 2005 10:13 am | ||
| ||
| Gangolf Haub | Untitled Comment | |
Voted 10/10 | Mille grazie! | |
| Posted Dec 5, 2005 11:34 am | ||
|