I've found a good, detailed group list for Styria on the Steiermark homepage. You may find it helpful, when new mountains and subgroups will come (it helped me with Stuhleck). And it is as official as it gets :-) no alpine authority, though.
Vid,
I like your page quite a lot. Very clear to me. I just miss some nice 'amusement' photos among the text...nice birdeye photos from whatever summit with wide views...
Further, good job trying to keep an order in the SP structure.
Thanks, John! This is what we started quite in the beginning of structuring SP pages. Now with SPv2 its much easier. But I'll still maintain this page.
Consider to add the map from
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Alps_-_Regions_%28Eastern_Alps%29.png
that is more or less the same as http://www.bergalbum.de/uebersichtskarte_ostalpen.htm
Well, as on the page there is already the link on your second address, I don't see much reasons to add another one. But thanks for pointing this out!
Cheers!
Thanks Cyrill!
I noticed that we still have almost nothing for Plessura Alps. So I linked in the table Mattjisch Horn, which is in the group. Yes, still a lot to post ;)
Cheers, Vid
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 31, 2009 11:17 am - Hasn't voted
Re: A joke?
You're very persistent, Borut. Honestly, I like clear classifications, order and valuable information. So, if there were area pages, mountain pages etc., where there would be doubts where they belong, I would take a definitive attitude. Put them on the West or on the East, but not both.
Albums on SummitPost are something which I prefer not to use. OK for personal memories, as containers of pictures, but not for "more serious" posting. Let's say, that an American creates an album "My Europe Mountaineering", and its content is a bit of Pyrenees, a bit of Alps and a bit of Scandinavia. He can attach that to all three regions, even if he spent in Scandinavia only a week and in Alps a whole month. It's anyway only an illustration, saying: "Look, I was here".
It's sad that Cyril's intention is wider. He wants to do and show lists of "famous" mountains, huts etc. So, a recommendation, what us more valueble in comparaison to the rest. I wouldn't do albums for that. If we had a page of Alps, his content would go there, but he's not fortunate enough, so he must post his Switzerland here and there.
I didn't answer you, I know. Sp, to conclude: I don't like it, but I'm just fine tolerating it. By the way, did you write to Cyril? He's the right address, if something has to be improved.
Vid Pogachnik - Apr 17, 2005 1:43 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks, for nice words! Yes, for the heigth and lat/lon I simply take the highest mountain.
Gumpie - May 31, 2005 1:17 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentWhat a great idea, the interactive map. Excellent work, thanks for all the time you put into it.
Vid Pogachnik - Jun 4, 2005 9:13 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for your visit :-)
NZDonald - Sep 16, 2005 4:00 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood page, Cheers.
Donald
Vid Pogachnik - Sep 17, 2005 3:25 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks :-)
dedo - Oct 4, 2005 2:33 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGreat work, Vid. The maps are really wonderful.
I've found a good, detailed group list for Styria on the Steiermark homepage. You may find it helpful, when new mountains and subgroups will come (it helped me with Stuhleck). And it is as official as it gets :-) no alpine authority, though.
Vid Pogachnik - Oct 5, 2005 8:43 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks a lot!
John Climber - Feb 19, 2006 10:32 pm - Voted 9/10
Good workVid,
I like your page quite a lot. Very clear to me. I just miss some nice 'amusement' photos among the text...nice birdeye photos from whatever summit with wide views...
Further, good job trying to keep an order in the SP structure.
Vid Pogachnik - Feb 26, 2006 8:59 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Good workThanks, John! This is what we started quite in the beginning of structuring SP pages. Now with SPv2 its much easier. But I'll still maintain this page.
DoJo - May 1, 2007 5:57 pm - Voted 10/10
mapConsider to add the map from
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Alps_-_Regions_%28Eastern_Alps%29.png
that is more or less the same as http://www.bergalbum.de/uebersichtskarte_ostalpen.htm
Vid Pogachnik - May 2, 2007 3:05 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: mapWell, as on the page there is already the link on your second address, I don't see much reasons to add another one. But thanks for pointing this out!
Cheers!
Vid Pogachnik - Jul 17, 2007 3:34 pm - Hasn't voted
To Do:In the table add:
Murzsteg Alps
On the map, add:
Livigno Alps
Murzsteg Alps
Mattjisch Horn
Cyrill - May 17, 2008 6:55 am - Voted 10/10
Alps - Eastern PartServus Vid
Precise description in this part, 10+ . I still added a few mountains and groups. On a good co-operation! Thanks for your help and indications.
Cheers Cyrill
Vid Pogachnik - May 18, 2008 4:49 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Alps - Eastern PartThanks Cyrill!
I noticed that we still have almost nothing for Plessura Alps. So I linked in the table Mattjisch Horn, which is in the group. Yes, still a lot to post ;)
Cheers, Vid
Cyrill - May 21, 2008 4:40 pm - Voted 10/10
Re: Alps - Eastern PartDo you have info's over this area (Plessur Alps)? That would be very good! Please write something
Vid Pogachnik - May 22, 2008 12:08 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Alps - Eastern PartNo, unfortunately I don't :(
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 29, 2009 5:36 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: A joke?That's a bit unusual, yes. But anyone can attach anything. All those 4000-ers are of course not in Eastern Alps, but Bernina is. Hm?
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 30, 2009 3:13 am - Hasn't voted
Re: A joke?I could, but why? 3000-ers can stay, alpine huts can stay as well. These both apply also to Alps Eastern part.
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 31, 2009 2:35 am - Hasn't voted
Re: A joke?I think those pages can stay attached.
Vid Pogachnik - Mar 31, 2009 11:17 am - Hasn't voted
Re: A joke?You're very persistent, Borut. Honestly, I like clear classifications, order and valuable information. So, if there were area pages, mountain pages etc., where there would be doubts where they belong, I would take a definitive attitude. Put them on the West or on the East, but not both.
Albums on SummitPost are something which I prefer not to use. OK for personal memories, as containers of pictures, but not for "more serious" posting. Let's say, that an American creates an album "My Europe Mountaineering", and its content is a bit of Pyrenees, a bit of Alps and a bit of Scandinavia. He can attach that to all three regions, even if he spent in Scandinavia only a week and in Alps a whole month. It's anyway only an illustration, saying: "Look, I was here".
It's sad that Cyril's intention is wider. He wants to do and show lists of "famous" mountains, huts etc. So, a recommendation, what us more valueble in comparaison to the rest. I wouldn't do albums for that. If we had a page of Alps, his content would go there, but he's not fortunate enough, so he must post his Switzerland here and there.
I didn't answer you, I know. Sp, to conclude: I don't like it, but I'm just fine tolerating it. By the way, did you write to Cyril? He's the right address, if something has to be improved.
Cheers!
Vid