by alpine345 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:11 pm
by Ben Beckerich » Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:46 pm
by ExcitableBoy » Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:48 pm
by The Chief » Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:23 am
by Ben Beckerich » Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:23 pm
by nartreb » Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:08 pm
by nartreb » Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:04 pm
by glahhg » Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:41 pm
by The Chief » Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:59 pm
glahhg wrote:How about you just not fall on the anchor? Quite standard really. If you think you'll FF2 on the anchor place a piece as soon as you can. If you can't place a piece then man up and don't fall.
by divnamite » Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:06 pm
The Chief wrote:Good point. But still does not answer the question which I presented regarding a leader fall AFTER sequential pro has been placed and the 2nd following on the lagging line. Counter tension pressure could create a potential total failure of the anchor.
I would not want to be part of a crew that has that happen to them and find out whether or not the anchor holds such a scenario.
by The Chief » Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:47 pm
divnamite wrote:The Chief wrote:Good point. But still does not answer the question which I presented regarding a leader fall AFTER sequential pro has been placed and the 2nd following on the lagging line. Counter tension pressure could create a potential total failure of the anchor.
I would not want to be part of a crew that has that happen to them and find out whether or not the anchor holds such a scenario.
Chief, how is this fall scenario any different than short-fixing?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests