fatdad wrote:Everyone's been saying that the fire is fueled by brush that hasn't burned in 40 yrs. That's a long time for fuel to accumulate.
I'm not an expert on this but why haven't they done controlled burns over the past years? Too difficult?
Having the Waterman area burn to the ground would indeed be a big loss. It's a beautiful area. Not to mention, if it rains next winter, I can see ACH being washed away once again.