taxinvestor wrote:How would everyone vote if their name was not attached to the vote?
That's how it was until the site changed, around Valentine's Day 2006. Lots of cowardly vengeful voting was a negative aspect of that system.
by Day Hiker » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:54 am
taxinvestor wrote:How would everyone vote if their name was not attached to the vote?
by T Sharp » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:14 am
MoapaPk wrote:I hate voting on stuff. A vote has become the equivalent of a friendly glance, or "have a nice day". So many on-line entities now have "like-unlike" buttons-- just another chance to offend or give a meaningless pat on the back.
Most of the stuff that comes up for a vote, I know little about; I mainly vote on the grammar and how pretty the page might be, or if there is an edifying story. Some times I see truly useful info. I particularly feel it is meaningless for me to vote on rock climbing routes, since I can't judge if the information is correct or not.
If you post info for a remote, little-known area, where the information might actually be useful to someone trying to reproduce the trip, then the chances are the info will be relevant only to a few people, so there will be few votes.
by Husker » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:38 am
squishy wrote:From time to time, I sort through all the photos which have no votes and find all those with lines drawn on them or useful maps and I vote on them, I think those are the most useful photos on SP and it's a shame they get zero votes...A few of us should always be doing this...
by Sleighty » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:55 am
That might be useful...and give everyone equal weight when voting.
by Scott » Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:57 am
and give everyone equal weight when voting.
by Guyzo » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:57 pm
Dingus Milktoast wrote:I vote 10 or not at all.
That is all.
DMT
by mrh » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:00 pm
Scott wrote:and give everyone equal weight when voting.
Problem is that people could create all the fake avatars they want and vote their own stuff.
by Alpinist » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:54 pm
JasonH wrote:squishy wrote:JasonH wrote:lcarreau wrote:Excuse um, but I can never finger out why some folks vote 8/10 or 9/10, and they leave
ZERO comment on how you can approve the page, or bring it up to par excellence.
Seems like some of these quiet, obscure folks should be communicating more ???
I love to get comments, both good and bad. BRING IT !!!!!!
8/10 and a 9/10 shouldn't be considered a bad vote. But if someone give a vote of 3 or lower then I think a little explanation is in order.
But it is a bad vote, such votes bring the photo's rating down...
And that is why I give everything a 10 unless the page is really bad. But that might be part of the problem
by Day Hiker » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:07 am
mrh wrote:Scott wrote:and give everyone equal weight when voting.
Problem is that people could create all the fake avatars they want and vote their own stuff.
True. Except they have already done that.
by Hotoven » Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:10 pm
Day Hiker wrote:As if one's summitpost point score or photo popularity is any indication of one's actual worth in life. Or penis size. Or whatever.
by Day Hiker » Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:00 pm
Hotoven wrote:Day Hiker wrote:As if one's summitpost point score or photo popularity is any indication of one's actual worth in life. Or penis size. Or whatever.
Wait...so I have been contributing for nothing?
by Mark Doiron » Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:49 pm
Day Hiker wrote:... the point scores don't mean shit.
by D-bo » Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:45 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests