LA Times article on Lone Pine

Regional discussion and conditions reports for the Golden State. Please post partners requests and trip plans in the California Climbing Partners forum.
User Avatar
EManBevHills

 
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 3:55 pm
Thanked: 2 times in 1 post

LA Times article on Lone Pine

by EManBevHills » Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:39 pm


User Avatar
fossana

 
Posts: 1013
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 9:31 pm
Thanked: 41 times in 32 posts

by fossana » Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:45 pm

Thanks for posting, Ernie.

I really hope they don't put in a giant development there. The real estate prices down there used to be higher than Bishop but not any more.

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

by MoapaPk » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:34 am

I might buy that lot for $59,000. Wait, I prefer Carl's Jr.

User Avatar
Augie Medina

 
Posts: 798
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:56 pm
Thanked: 11 times in 8 posts

by Augie Medina » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:03 am

Dougb wrote: It has no jobs...


So it's no different than a lot of the country :lol:

Seriously, I'd hang on to your real estate there as well.


Sure hope it never comes to pass that Whitney Portal Rd is lined with luxury condos.

User Avatar
rdesota

 
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 6:40 am
Thanked: 3 times in 1 post

by rdesota » Thu Sep 23, 2010 3:50 am

Since there are really no jobs there and since the second home market wont' recover for years, many years, I have to laugh a little at the notion that everyone is scared of development there. Think we are safe on that one. You can buy finished high end developments in the best resort areas of the country for pennies on the dollar out of foreclosure. It'll take a while to work off the inventory. In the meantime, it'd be great if someone bought the ranch and held it for the next generation...

User Avatar
Guyzo

 
Posts: 2567
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:11 am
Thanked: 24 times in 13 posts

Re:

by Guyzo » Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:46 am

Dougb wrote:n/t


I always wonder about folks who post than delete. Weird mind games going on, I guess.

Over the years I have changed my views about the east side.

I now think that it's a good thing that the DWP owns about 80% of everything.

The DWP is nice and lets all of us roam over 99% of what they own.

If no DWP, the whole east side would be one huge city, farming town, with 90% of it fenced off and covered with "no trespassing" signs.

Like Dorango, Colorado.

and that would suck.

Late :wink:

User Avatar
wallspeck

 
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 1:48 pm
Thanked: 15 times in 8 posts

Re: LA Times article on Lone Pine

by wallspeck » Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:53 am

Guyzo, that's funny. I agree.
The "evil" Department of Water and Power has become the hero? Ha ha ha.
There is nothing worse than a gigantic mega-ranch which blocks all access.
There are places in other western states where there is NO ACCESS to certain mountain ranges for distances of 20 or 30 miles or more.
The West side of the Sierra has escaped this fate only because of the huge amount of National Forest buttressing it.
But then again, there is so much wild land to explore, we'll never see even a micro-percent of it. So why would anyone care if a bit of it gets blocked and/or developed?
And there's always the "long way around" for the truly desirous.

User Avatar
Guyzo

 
Posts: 2567
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 12:11 am
Thanked: 24 times in 13 posts

Re: LA Times article on Lone Pine

by Guyzo » Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:05 pm

Jack, I guess your right.

Who would really care if access was blocked?

I mean, once you have climbed a mountain, you realize that they are pretty much all the same. :wink: 8)

Just like trees.

Late

GK


Return to California

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests