You want more climbers here? Then make it easier to contribute content. I have tried to do my part on this with the Bulk Uploader (and got the bruises on my ass to prove it). About 3 years ago I recognized that the site needs to keep up with the norms for putting things on the web...it shouldn't be harder to operate here than it is on Flickr, Facebook, wherever.
That was one idea I had. And I was amazed at how many people disagreed with me. At least one of the highly respected former climbing contributors here completely disagreed. (haha, I was picturing him as my target audience as I wrote the code, so funny how life works ).
My other big idea is that page ownership is a fetish that "real" climbers don't have time to indulge. They just want information, the more recent and specific the better. Therefore I kept bringing up wiki-like ideas and was strongly voted down. I don't know about a wiki, but something like you see a list of the things people did in an area in the last week, linked to route pages. Lots of sites do this now. Summitpost doesn't. (Don't tell me to scroll the summit logs, I tried that with an open mind already).
So I still hang around because, well, I *like* the place. Met some cool people here. And I like the idea of one site for the world. But for climbing content now I use a variety of local sites in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Italy. They have a lower barrier to add content, and hell, I guess people like posting stuff in their native language (damn furriners :p).
The number of technical climbers here was always small. I'm glad to hear that they were/are appreciated for the wet hemp rope smell they bring to a room (ha). My feeling is they are shying away from this place too. I've seen it happen a few times that an amazing climber with massive accomplishments comes in and makes a crappy page. They get a bevy of helpful suggestions that just look like a hell of a lot of work and disappear. The big problem is that the work of adding routes is just too close to duplicating guidebook data, which most climbers still have to buy or borrow anyway for the region they live in (okay not Dow's Canada).
So you want climbers to hang out here but you don't really want to make changes to make it possible. If you make it easier to add images you fear the dreaded flower and kitten pictures. If you make pages more collaborative you bristle and assert the importance of ownership.
It also strikes me that the site is both super open in terms of what you can use it for (not necessarily bad), but also frustratingly rigid in terms of future change/features. People sense that there isn't a living vision behind where it should go.
And this is true! The site owner is long retired from thought-duty. The Elves are highly competent but by definition conservative. The programmer is overworked and unpaid.
To the extent that a new generation can come and use this infrastructure and be happy and creative with it, the site will retain the vibrancy it needs to keep these back room grumblings from showing up on the front page. Note also that technical climbers didn't start that way on day one. I'm thinking of at least one guy in the PNW who can put up with the infrastructure for adding content, and is going out on gradually more technical trips. You never know where that ends up.
Peace,
--m